Is the Home Secretary being played by the securicrats?
Number 413 in my series of Questions to Which the Answer is No is asked by Jonathan Derbyshire at the New Statesman. He quotes Andrew Rawnsley’s interesting column in which Rawnsley makes the mistake of assuming that the security services want to take away people’s civil liberties (because … er, contd p94) and therefore have to think up pretend threats in order to justify extraordinary powers:
Insiders believe an inexperienced home secretary has been easily captured by securicrats who are always reluctant to give up powers once they have them.
This is moonshine with a silly hat on. The reason these uncomfortable and difficult powers, which no one in the security services would want, are retained is because there are a small number of people who they, the courts and the independent anti-terrorism law reviewer accept pose a potential threat to you, me, Shami Chakrabarti, Jonathan Derbyshire, Andrew Rawnsley and all.control orders, headline, theresa may
Recent Posts on Eagle Eye
- The King of Bhutan’s hopes in 1987 for Gross National Happiness are valid today
- Cameron and Modi bond as they woo some 60,000 overseas Indians at Wembley
- Modi tries to revamp his battered image as he flies to London
- Big defeat for India's Narendra Modi just before UK visit
- Mark Carney is compromising the Bank of England’s independence
Latest from Independent journalists on Twitter