Is the Egyptian revolution sidelining women?

3307940 300x236 Is the Egyptian revolution sidelining women?On the first International Women’s Day one hundred years ago more than one million people marched in the streets across Europe to call for an end to discrimination and for women to have the same rights as men to work, vote and to shape the future of their countries.

One hundred years later, the reality is that women are still much more likely to be poor. They are more likely to be illiterate. They earn only ten per cent of the world’s income but do two thirds of the world’s work. They produce up to 80 per cent of the food in developing countries but own only one per cent of the land.

In many countries, they are still told what they can do, even what they can wear. Women in Saudi Arabia, Chechnya and Iran face harassment if they don’t observe conservative religious dress codes. Muslim women in Belgium, France and some parts of Spain may soon break the law there if they do.

Women campaigning for change are often met with derision, abuse or worse. In places like Russia, the Philippines, Mexico and Nepal, leading activists have recently been murdered for speaking out. In China, Bangladesh, India, Zimbabwe and many other countries, they are routinely detained and tortured.

Yet the international community largely ignores these facts. Women’s inequality is seen as regrettable but inevitable.

The dramatic events of the past two months have seen millions taking to the streets throughout the Middle East and North Africa, calling for change.

Women stood beside men, demanding an end to political repression and calling for root and branch reform. Both women and men have suffered under these repressive governments. But women have also had to cope with discriminatory laws and deeply entrenched gender inequality.

So it’s no wonder that women took to the streets. That they cheered loudly when Mubarak fell. Or that they wanted to believe the promise of a new dawn in Egyptian politics. But it remains to be seen how much will really change for the women of Egypt.

Many governments – including many from the West – still only seem to support women’s rights when it’s convenient. Their rights are often used as bargaining chips in the struggle for control of the international agenda.

When negotiations with the Taleban seem like a good step, suddenly women’s rights don’t matter so much. When they need Pakistan as an ally, they accept the Pakistani government giving autonomy to regions of the country where women are utterly victimised by the parallel legal system. And alliances are made in Iraq with militia that in their spare time attack and kill women’s rights activists.

And so it goes in Egypt, where as the country begins to look toward its future, women are in danger of being sidelined again.

Incredibly, despite decades of discrimination and inequality, women are being denied a role in the creation of a new Egypt. They are being excluded by both the caretaker government and the international community. Most recently, a new national committee formed to write the new Egyptian constitution was composed only of men. This is not acceptable.

If the international community truly cared about women’s rights in Egypt, they would be championing women’s participation in every aspect of building new systems and institutions.

This behaviour by the interim authorities and the international community betrays a sense of paternalism all too familiar to Egyptian women who have spent decades living under an oppressive government supported by supposedly rights-respecting states.

As existing governments scramble to change and new governments emerge, all must commit to respecting women’s equality, both in law and in practice. But women will only have that equality if they actively engage in all the negotiations and decisions taking place during this time of transition.

For the promise of change in Egypt and elsewhere in the region – and the world – to be fulfilled, women of diverse backgrounds and political persuasions must be at the table as full partners.

A lot has changed in the last 100 years, and yet many of the same problems remain. In many countries, government commitments to reforms have lagged behind needs. Discrimination still cuts deeply across societies, leaving a trail of inequality in its wake.

The call for equality, fairness and respect was at the heart of the first International Women’s Day. A century on, it still is.

Widney Brown is Amnesty International’s Senior Director of Law and Policy

Tagged in: , , ,
  • hunfred

    I ask again at what point in the story is she telling lies?

  • eeore

    Where does amnesty’s money come from?

  • JohnBEllis

    Roughly the sort of answer that I expected. If you could remove your head from between the cleft of your cultural buttocks, you might see the point, but I can see it’s probably too much to expect.

  • hunfred

    That is an inteligent answer!! Thank you so much.

  • solar123

    The issue here aside from Hunfred being mentally challenged. Is that the article purported to say something about Egypt, with the implication women are being sidelined. It argued why women shouldn’t be sidelined and no-one questioned that it just didn’t do what it said on the can. I personally found that disappointing. Hunfred brought something new to the comments his invective against the Egyptian people (some of the commentators here self included are Egyptian) and denigrating our beliefs as if there is something negative in them and if he drew that from the article it was as I said, misleading. If he brought that from his own bias then the article with its headline attracted him looking for dirt. Either way he is a loser and the article as I said earlier was really a non-article to fill space on womens day.

  • JohnBEllis

    Happy to debate reasonably and courteously with anybody. But one curt and hectoring answer tends to evoke another.

    Which, incidentally, is why what comes over as yet more hectoring by westerners gets the finger from people in the middle east and elsewhere in the developing world, even when the point being made is fundamentally a rational and humane one.

  • hunfred

    You have a serious deficiency in the Irony department.How about this you’re as thick as two short planks.Got it yet.

Most viewed



Property search
Browse by area

Latest from Independent journalists on Twitter