Blogs

Mock the weak: Gervais’s disability gibes

Laurence Clark

SNN1923GA 682 1393419a 480x345 300x215 Mock the weak: Gervaiss disability gibesI’m no stranger to using taboo words about disability in my comedy.  Three years ago I took my stand-up comedy show ‘Spastic Fantastic’ to the Edinburgh Fringe.  The show followed my attempts, as someone with cerebral palsy, to reclaim the word ‘spastic’.  These attempts ranged from slipping the word into conversations at parties to posing on the streets as a market researcher for Spazz Stick lipbalm (which really does exist).  I even filmed my acapela boy band of people with cerebral palsy, called ‘Spastic Fantastic’, performing to passers-by on the South Ban.

In many ways disabled comics can get away with this sort of close-to-the-bone material by approaching it through our own personal experiences of disability.  This can often be to the envy of non-disabled comics who can all too easily come across as ignorant or insensitive when trying to tackle edgy disability material.

I used my show ‘Spastic Fantastic’ to test my theory that the press would much rather focus on what to call disabled people, as opposed to what we’ve got to say.  This theory was borne out by the fact the show got far more publicity and, as a consequence larger audiences than anything else I’ve done to date.  I’m pretty sure this theory is not lost on Ricky Gervais too!

For Gervais to argue that the meaning of ‘mong’ has now somehow evolved to a point where it no longer has connotations for people with Down syndrome simply doesn’t ring true to me.  Granted, in modern culture the word has now taken on other meanings, such as being slow on the uptake and gurning after taking ecstasy tablets, however these meanings can clearly be traced back to the original.

If Ricky Gervais has the courage of his convictions then he should take his argument about how the meaning of ‘mong’ has changed to a self-advocacy group of people with learning difficulties, such as People First.  I’m sure they would waste no time enlightening him as to exactly how this word is still used in hateful, malicious ways against them.

However whilst I think Gervais’s argument is wrong, I would always defend his right to free speech without censorship.  I’d never want disabled people to be treated as ‘special cases’ or ‘off-limits’ as this could potentially be even more damaging. For far too long we were largely excluded from mainstream media, due I believe in part to ignorance around how to talk about and include us in a positive way.

Gervais himself helped turn this around with some brilliantly insightful portrayals of disabled characters in The Office and Extras, and I’ve no doubt there’s more to come with the imminent arrival of Life’s Too Short.  However this kind of intelligent, considered comedy writing is a far cry from his recent controversial tweets.  Every comic has to make a judgement call with their material and, in this instance I can’t help but think he’s miscalculated.

Laurence has just finished filming a documentary for BBC 1 about himself and his family. The programme is narrated by David Tennant and is due to be shown next February.

Tagged in: , , , ,
  • PaulThomasHopkins

    Wasn’t that a Stuart Lee line? He concluded we should have some ambition and mock the strong.  Gervaise does

  • Chris Mastry

    Gervais is about as funny as a swarm of hornets attacking your Testicles!

  • Sable_Basilisk

    An article elsewhere in this paper today covered the subject of the increase in attacks, both verbal and physical, on another minority sector of society- homosexuals and transgenders. So here’s another easy target Ricky- how about some “cleverly ironic” jokes about poofters, shirt-lifters and dykes- or is that a bit too unmodish?

  • i41

    It would appear that the lower we are prepared to sink in moral terms the higher our pay cheque is likely to be.
    Freedom of speech is vital to any society, but with our freedoms come responsibility, and with responsibility comes accountability. Break any link in the chain and you lose the right to be listened to as a responsible member of society with something sensible to say.
    There is no greater tonic than humour, I could not envisage a life without it, but used maliciously it can be a vicious and destructive tool, the end point of which is to denigrate, demoralise and devalue the individuals (or groups) under attack.

  • http://www.facebook.com/dante.dixon Dante Dixon

    To be honest, i never knew the word ‘mong’ had anything to do with downs until i started to read about this whole Ricky situation.  Not to say that i use the word, am not a big fan of mindless cussing.. but it does bring make me wonder.  Sticks and stones eh?

  • bananamana

    I was once a Catholic & I’m familiar with the Annunciation. I’m also familiar with the word “pronunciation” and the word “pronounce”….
    You can find “annunciate” in “the dictionary”, but that doesn’t make it a good word – but that’s a long debate – granting for the sake of argument that it’s ok, then, as you say, it would mean “announce”. 
    I trust you’d agree at least that Hal probably wasn’t trying to say “you can’t expect the guy to *announce* a coherent argument”, but more likely was aiming for something like enunciate (express in clear terms) or articulate…. as I said in my original post.
    Whatever.


Property search
Browse by area

Latest from Independent journalists on Twitter