Clegg “did not agree” to the veto

Just to elaborate on my previous post, because I did not write down Nick Clegg’s actual words on the Andrew Marr programme. I had not realised quite how humiliating his position now is. Here is the BBC report:

The Deputy Prime Minister said he had learned of the veto in a phone call from the Prime Minister at 0400 GMT, shortly before Mr Cameron gave a press conference announcing it publicly.

Asked what his reaction had been, the Lib Dem leader said: “I said this was bad for Britain.

“I made it clear that it was untenable for me to welcome it.”

That sounded to me like, “I reluctantly agreed to it but I didn’t like it,” which is why I thought this morning’s headlines, especially in The Independent on Sunday, “Clegg rages at Cameron’s ’spectacular failure”’, were having cake and eating it.

However, I am told by a good source that Clegg “didn’t agree to using the veto”. So what Clegg was actually saying to Marr was, “I was bounced; I disagree with the policy of the Government which I jointly lead; but I’m not going to resign, not even on an issue of such historic and fundamental principle.”

That is much, much worse.

Photograph: BBC/Getty Images

Recent Posts on Eagle Eye - Breaking views from commentators -

• Boris Johnson and the euro brick wall
• Wow. The graph to delight Miliband backers
• The Growth Agenda
• Blairite and Brownite coalition re-forged
• Poll: Labour gain as Tories suffer from euro crisis