Blogs

How about letting communities build themselves in 2012?

Dave Clements

120773851 300x201 How about letting communities build themselves in 2012?Communities took quite a hammering in 2011. There were the riots, of course, in which the opportunism of the apologists for them among the commentariat was more than a match for the rioters themselves. Instead of an honest appraisal of what went on, there were shameless projections of prejudices onto those actually quite unprecedented events. I even found myself in the unusual situation of agreeing with Theresa May when she said the rioters ‘weren’t trying to make any political or social statement; they were thieving, pure and simple’. But even before the riots, those self-same commentators had been anticipating the damage to come from economic crisis and the government’s austere response to it. From rough sleeping, to wife-beating and rioting, no doubt, communities would begin to descend into all manner of deprivation and depravity, we were told. The Joseph Rowntree Foundation warned early in the year that ‘fortunes may nosedive’ for the poorest as community-builders lost their foothold (not to mention their livelihoods).

More recently, as the well and truly hammered were being picked up by the seasonal booze bus, the emptying out of the high street (of shoppers at least) met with dire warnings. Mary Portas, author of a government-commissioned report on the subject, talked of how they would ‘give a sense of belonging and trust to a community’ if only they could be revived. As if to confirm that all may not be lost, the organisers of Britain in Bloom (the UK’s largest voluntary campaign), reported that their tens of thousands of amateur gardeners still ‘built strong communities’. Nevertheless, the government’s flagship Big Society seems to have sunk without trace, living on only in a tiresome spat about cuts to public services and the voluntary sector; and in ongoing complaints, most recently by the public administration select committee (does anyone actually know what that is?) Without a Big Society minister, the select committee concluded, how could they (or we?) build a Big Society?

In its absence, Baroness Hanham rather pinned her hopes on the Localism Bill currently passing through the House of Lords. She thought it might help bring an end to a public sector culture that has ‘fostered dependency, with top-down targets, smothering bureaucracy and heavy-handed guidance’. But I continued to wonder whether localism – a creed that ‘attracts support across the political divide’ according to Hanham – was ever really going to make a difference. The consensus that localism is a good thing had done nothing to rebuild communities to date, and there was little reason to believe that more of the same would do any better. Having said that, I welcomed the deputy prime minister’s ‘very serious offer of more economic freedom and more political freedom’ to the nation’s core cities. There is a world of difference between advocating better local democracy and greater autonomy for cities and resorting to the petty parochialism that only tends toward a dismembering of the body politic.

Our communities, after all, are not blighted by distant political structures, redundant community-builders or deserted high streets, anymore than they were brought to ruin by the seasonally inebriated, horticulturally indifferent or riotously uncivil. They continue to stumble along despite community-worriers’ diminished view of their members as dependent, incapable of running their own lives and finding their own solutions to their problems. Perhaps instead of hammering communities into submission, we might be best to leave them to build themselves in 2012?

The Independent Online is partnering with the Battle of Ideas festival to present a series of guest blogs from festival speakers on the key questions of our time.

Dave Clements is a writer on social policy, co-editor of The Future of Community, and convenor of the Institute of Ideas’ Social Policy Forum.

  • http://twitter.com/EnergiseBarnet Nigel Farren

    Communities are already building themselves and I disagree that government’s flagship Big Society has sunk without trace. Across the country, 000s of community energy initiatives like Energise Barnet are bringing citizens, schools, faith groups, sports clubs, resident associations and businesses etc, together for the common good of improving environmental well-being and eliminating fuel poverty.
    And, when the Green Deal launches in late 2012, these community-driven initiatives will be new exemplars for the Big Society and localism as they lead the way in delivering the biggest home improvement programme since the second world war.

  • coffejohn

    One of the problems that I have encountered with community groups is that assistance is only available if you “fit in” with the ideas of Local government.
    Dare to be original and all assistance disappears, too dangerous to back.

  • madasafish

    You obviously don’t live in a community . If you did, your question is superfluous..

    It’s called “helping others”.

  • robinbaldock

    Its all so backwards.

     Money given to banks so it can disappear into offshore accounts and commodities trading that forces prices for basics artificially high.

    In a siphon up society money needs to be given to the bottom rung, the charities and social services so it can circulate up through the economy before it is skimmed off by the elite, never to be of practical use again.

    We seem as far away from doing that as we are from any other effective challenge to anti-Keynesian economics.

  • DrTechnical

    I have to say that the majority of “so called” communities in and around my area are’nt really what I consider as “TRUE communities”, within the TRUE meaning of the word, but are either ethnic minority immigrant groups wanting as much cash as they can get…. OR impoverished & dysfunctional ”socially challenged” groups that can’t work life out for themselves anyway…?

    Either way I have seen really GOOD money frankly wasted in the name of “community projects”…”ESOL”…Charity contributions…ESF also ESL funding and local gov run/council initiatives where in most cases most initiatives went back to the very start again or DIDN’T get to start after quite short times…

    For instance SEVERAL MILLION£££££ was GIVEN to a community initiative in Marsh Farm Luton where SEVERAL MILLION seems still unaccounted…”value for money” it seemed NOT…nothing now to show for it…?

    Racial communities in the same area seem only to focus on themselves (i.e AS a racial community) but have received funding, also facilities galore to do so…!

    My point maybe is that; despite funding from wherever it comes from, it is the attitude of the people involved that needs “adjusting”…not the LACK of any funding as some claim…!

    Hence we WILL see more riots, looting and thieveing as that IS what these people do best!
    CAN a truly POOR person afford to buy and run say a blackberry mobile OR have home PCs etc etc yet claim “SOCIETY” has let them down and that “NOBODY LISTENS”


Property search
Browse by area

Latest from Independent journalists on Twitter