Against the People’s Pledge
That is a policy combination with which I had much sympathy in the distant past when I was chief leader writer at The Independent and Andrew Marr was its editor. I was a advocate of Britain’s EU membership, although not an enthusiastic one and I never thought adopting the euro was a good idea; and I thought referendums were a way of dealing with the weakness of democratic consent for the EU.
I thought the promise of a referendum on the euro was a powerful safeguard against its ever being adopted here. And I thought the idea of drawing up a European Constitution, the conspiracy of the Giscard d’Estaing elite, should have started from the premise that it should be capable of winning referendums in all member states. I dimly remember Marr putting something of this kind on the front page of The Independent.
So when the possibility of an in-out referendum was raised, as it has been occasionally since 1975, support for the idea on supposedly pro-European, supposedly democratic grounds was attractive.
But then, no.
I have become more sceptical about our membership of the EU recently, partly as a result of the demonstration of the unworkability of the euro. But I think the idea of a referendum on our EU membership is daft.
The point of a referendum is to make a proposal and to seek the electorate’s support for it. Those who want to leave the EU, a surprisingly small number in the House of Commons, despite the election of the most Eurosceptic parliamentary Conservative Party ever, have a proposal to make. Plainly, if they could command a parliamentary majority for it, it would require the consent of the people to be carried out. We are nowhere near that point.
The overwhelming majority of MPs want Britain to remain in the EU, despite the contradictions in that position that Daniel Finkelstein and I have pointed out. What is the point of putting “no change” to a popular vote? Allegedly, it is because the pro-Europeans have lost one part of the argument (on the euro) and hope to win a referendum just to shut Douglas Carswell up. As a plan, it has all the failsafe certainty and intellectual solidity of a dead stick insect.
So I take the opposite view to Peter’s. I am anti-European and anti-referendum. Not where I expected to be at all.Tagged in: euroscepticism
Recent Posts on Eagle Eye
- The King of Bhutan’s hopes in 1987 for Gross National Happiness are valid today
- Cameron and Modi bond as they woo some 60,000 overseas Indians at Wembley
- Modi tries to revamp his battered image as he flies to London
- Big defeat for India's Narendra Modi just before UK visit
- Mark Carney is compromising the Bank of England’s independence
Latest from Independent journalists on Twitter