Hey unis, leave our exams alone
As a student from a middling state school approaching the end of my time in higher education, I think A-level examinations set by university lecturers could be seriously damaging for both the aspirations and the achievements of those at less successful schools. This fear is amplified when you consider that Education Secretary Michael Gove suggests that the majority of question-setting responsibilities would be handed to academics from Russell Group universities; the UK’s 24 leading research institutions. According to their official website, only one in five British students attends a Russell Group university. So why should all students be forced to either meet their high academic standards or fail?
When was it decided that the sole function of the A-level was as a ticket allowing the bearer admission to university? Those who decide not to go on to higher education seem to be forgotten here, and, as the tuition fee rise takes hold in September, they will only increase in number. Having good A-levels can be a great advantage in the job market in its own right; they should not be made inaccessible for those who do not aspire to university. In my school, this accounted for a third of the sixth-form, most of whom have gone on to very decent jobs thanks to the extra edge their further study awarded them.
Having exams set by the Russell Group could perhaps also deter those who may be aiming for a less traditional course from applying to university. If they are not put off education altogether by the difficulty of the proposed A-level curriculum, they could struggle to meet the academic requirements of the courses and fail to get a place. Not getting a university place because you failed your exams seems fair enough on the surface, but in many cases the level of academic achievement required by the A-level would surpass anything they would ever be required to do at university.
A worst-case scenario could be that universities which specialise in more vocational courses would be closed altogether or merged, resulting in a rapid back-pedalling on the last fifty years of higher education progress. Of course, some would be very happy with this outcome. But a move which could spell disaster for so many students and institutions should at least be opened up to public discussion, rather than occurring as a by-product of a policy supposedly designed to improve the education system.
As Julia Neal, a teacher and former president of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, has rightly pointed out, “We are preparing our students for entry not just to Russell Group universities but other universities as well…this is in danger of becoming very elitist.” Elitism, as a concept, desperately needs to be eliminated from the higher education system. It serves no useful function other than making those from less successful schools feel intimidated. Coming from an average school where only 14 per cent of pupils go on to a ‘selective’ university, my memories of my first weeks at a Russell Group university were dominated by a sense of being out of my depth; not quite good enough. If my A-level classes had made me feel like this too, I wonder whether I would even have applied. I came to realise that the school you went to doesn’t make you any more intelligent; nor does it make you more stupid. Exactly the same is true with the type of exams you take. Whoever sets the questions, it all comes down to this: those with teachers who are better equipped to prepare them for an exam will generally perform slightly better.
It has also been reported that some universities have been forced to give ‘remedial’ classes to get first-year students ‘up to scratch’ in their chosen subject. Unsurprisingly, the reaction to this has been one of abject horror at the state of Britain’s schools. However, realistically, could these classes not be seen as a positive thing? It shows that students are arriving on the same university courses from a variety of educational backgrounds, and although ensuring that they all possess the same essential background knowledge may be an inconvenience, the diversity it reveals is something to be applauded. After all, education is nothing if not a great leveller.
Photo credit: Getty ImagesTagged in: A-levels, education, exams, michael gove
Recent Posts on Notebook
- World Aids Day 2013: No time for complacency
- Barking Blondes: The health of the Hound Pound
- On the ground in the Philippines: It will be years until there’s even a semblance of normality for the people affected
- Barking Blondes: Chewing on technology
- The true cost of divorce: The growing problem of hidden assets
Latest from Independent journalists on Twitter