Sepp Blatter’s assertion that goal-line technology is a ‘necessity’ is anti-football
It won’t have gone unnoticed by anti-England conspiracy theorists that Sepp Blatter thinks goal-line technology is “a necessity” after England were on the fortunate end of a wrong decision.
After digging in his heels for years over the decision to implement technology, following last night’s effort by Marco Devic for Ukraine, the Fifa president has today said that its implementation is imperative.
Technology which ensures that when a ball fully crosses the line, a goal is given, were already afoot. Tests have been conducted at Wembley Stadium and there is talk it could be used in English domestic football as soon as the 2013/14 season. Ironically, these moves began after England’s Frank Lampard was denied a clear goal at the 2010 World Cup.
Following Blatter’s tweet: “After last night’s match GLT is no longer an alternative but a necessity” there would now seem no doubt that technology will soon be a part of the game.
But is he right? Of course there is a strong argument for technology. When the ball crosses the line, everyone wants to see a goal given. England fans were in no mood to argue about last night’s mistake – Ukraine should have been back in the match.
Uefa president Michel Platini is less of a convert to GLT. He told reporters in Warsaw: “With five, officials see everything.” The former French international is clearly burying his head in the sand – the officials don’t see everything – as proved by last night’s mistake.
Platini went on to justify his opposition to goal-line technology.
“Goal-line technology isn’t a problem,” he said.
“The problem is the arrival of technology because, after, you’ll need technology for deciding handballs and then for offside decisions and so on. It’ll be like that forever and ever.
“It’ll never stop. That’s the problem I have.”
And this is where Platini is right.
Once GLT has been implemented and is as common a part of the game as offside and the pass-back rule, it will only be a matter of time before there are calls for the furthering of technology in the game. Could penalty decisions be appealed? Should red cards be ratified by a fourth official with a video monitor at his disposal? As incidents crop up, so will the arguments for it’s further use.
Some may wonder what is wrong with this. Surely getting the big decisions right is a good thing – and indeed it is.
But the beauty of football – unlike any other sport – is its accessibility for all. One only needs a ball and one can play football – whether alone or with friends, or for your school, or with a Sunday league side. Jumpers for goal posts as they say.
You don’t see this with other sports. It’s difficult to play on your own with a rugby ball. You need wickets, bats, pads and boxes to play cricket. You need rackets, courts and rich parents to play tennis. A multitude of clubs are needed to play golf and lets not even start on American sports.
Football is for all and it’s why it’s the most popular game in the world – by a long distance. Should technology become a prevalent part of the game, it will threaten that, and that’s why it should be resisted.
Whether Blatter’s assertion hints at an anti-England conspiracy is irrelevant – it’s anti-football.
Follow Simon Rice on Twitter @simonriceTagged in: england, euro 2012, football, GLT, goal-line technology, Michel Platini, penalties, Sepp Blatter, Uefa
Recent Posts on Football
- The Football Lawyer: Uefa has made moves to stamp out racism, but only time will tell if they grow more forceful
- The Wasteland: Cruzeiro's Brazilian title triumph turns Rio and São Paulo into footballing tiddlers
- From the Centipede to the Rat Hunter – How Brazil’s longest suffering club escaped from the wilderness
- Fifa threatens Brazil with World Cup expulsion (almost...)
- The Football Lawyer: Qatar 2022 compensation claims and the problem with quotas
Latest from Independent journalists on Twitter