Ed Balls: Things Should Be Cheaper
In my capacity as the Shadow Chancellor’s auxiliary press officer, here is a transcript of him on BBC Radio 4 The World at One explaining why petrol should be cheaper.
Ed Stourton: I imagine that this step would be extremely popular but would it be wise?
Ed Balls: I think it would be wise and popular and the reason is because at the moment, as you heard [in preceding package], even though the economy is just out of recession people are under real pressure. Businesses and families, their budgets under real pressure – taxes up, living standards down and the petrol price is higher than at the election and higher than it was when George Osborne postponed this rise back in the summer following calls from Labour. So if he is being consistent what he should be doing is agreeing with us that this is the wrong time to go ahead with this hit for families.
ES: The government of course make the point that it was your government that introduced this system?
EB: But the Chancellor is in charge and he makes decisions Budget to Budget and he has confirmed these tax rises to go ahead and I don’t think he should now because the petrol price is too high and it’s too risky for the economy. When Labour was in government I think there were 13 different occasions when Labour in government either didn’t go ahead with a rise at all or only held the rise in real-terms, didn’t go ahead with an extra rise because governments have to be flexible and even if your approach is to get the tax revenues in to pay for public services and to get the deficit down, when the petrol price is very high and it’s very painful for people then the right thing to do is to postpone – that’s what he should do.
ES: And how would you make up the financial shortfall – it’s a lot of money?
EB: Well we have proposed that the government closes a tax avoidance abuse that is happening at the moment which is happening in the agency employment sector where individuals are being employed by umbrella companies and then certain companies are then claiming a whole load of expenses for those people to offset against tax which is estimated to be costing £750 million, even more. We are saying on a cautious estimate, half of that money would pay for the postponement from January to April. The Chancellor should do it right now, he should announce his intention to go ahead and do that.
ES: Well if there is a bit of extra cash available shouldn’t that be used to pay off a bit of the deficit?
EB: Well that is an interesting debate Ed because the problem we have at the moment is that the borrowing, the deficit this year so far, is higher than last year. The deficit is going up not down…
ES: Well that makes the case stronger doesn’t it?
EB: Well I’m not sure actually because the reason why that’s happened is two things. First of all we have had a double dip recession which means you’ve got fewer people in work paying tax and confidence is down but also businesses and families are under pressure and they’re struggling and they are not spending and what you’ve got to do is get some confidence back into this economy. If not, the deficit it is going to carry on, as with George Osborne this year, it’s going to carry on going up and I think it’s very complacent if I’m honest with you for the government to cross their fingers and hope for the best. This recovery is not secured, families are under pressure, the government should act to kick-start the recovery, to build homes to get people back to work and not go ahead with the petrol price rise. That is the way to secure the recovery and get the deficit down.
ES: Are you expecting support from rebel Tories with your motion today?
EB: Well I hope so and on Friday there were clearly Conservative MPs who are in touch with their constituents and know that this is the wrong time for them to be voting for a rise in petrol tax. There have been nods and winks again from the Chancellor in the last 24 hours. He is hoping that people will stay away tonight and not vote on the Conservative side, but I think I would say to Conservative MPs, I wouldn’t take a nod or a wink from this Chancellor as sufficient. I would want to make a clear statement to my constituents this is the wrong thing to do and I am going to vote with Labour.Tagged in: economics of the madhouse, ed balls, fuel duty
Recent Posts on Eagle Eye
- The King of Bhutan’s hopes in 1987 for Gross National Happiness are valid today
- Cameron and Modi bond as they woo some 60,000 overseas Indians at Wembley
- Modi tries to revamp his battered image as he flies to London
- Big defeat for India's Narendra Modi just before UK visit
- Mark Carney is compromising the Bank of England’s independence
Latest from Independent journalists on Twitter