The Thatcher Effect

John Rentoul

thatcher2 300x168 The Thatcher EffectWhat effect will her death, funeral and its media coverage have on British politics? Not much, I suspect, despite a tiny flurry of interest in this morning’s YouGov poll, which showed the Labour lead at seven points – the lowest since, oh, three months ago. That is well within the margin of variation you would expect in 19 out of 20 polls (roughly, if Labour’s lead is 10 points, that margin would be from a lead of four points to one of 16).

The contrast between the opinion polls and the tone of media coverage over the past 10 days has been striking. Her popularity among a large and passionate minority is balanced by a smaller and equally passionate minority who disliked her, and another group in the middle who range from mild antipathy to not being sure who she was. The Independent on Sunday’s poll by ComRes put David Cameron’s description of her, “the greatest British peacetime prime minister”, to the public, and 41 per cent disagreed, as against 33 per cent who agreed. She won three elections all right, but remember that the second was against Michael Foot and the third was against Neil Kinnock – brave as he was, he had no chance in 1987.

Jonathan Freedland in The Guardian makes a good case for why the outpouring of Tory admiration means trouble for David Cameron. The Prime Minister is “damned if he is too much like her; damned if he does not resemble her enough”. He has tried to straddle Thatcherite effusion and centre-ground moderation, and not done it very well. His “we are all Thatcherites now” this morning got the tone wrong, and, although the extravagance of the whole show was all Tony Blair’s fault (the arrangements were approved by Blair and then Gordon Brown years ago), Cameron could have turned down the pageantometer a nidge or two.

It is also true that Ed Miliband has been “unruffled” by the whole thing – and that his tribute in the House of Commons last week was unusually well-judged.

But the net effect of the whole thing is probably neutral. The paying of respects to the household goddess of the Tory core vote, and even the shedding of a tear during Bishop Chartres’s sermon by George Osborne, allows the Conservative leadership to close a chapter of the party’s history. (I did like Chartres’s inversion of her catchphrase, saying that now “she is one of us”.)

Having paid their respects, Cameron and Osborne can now get on with the business of persuading voters who didn’t care for her much that the Government is on their side. It puts the Thatcher myths, so divisive in the Tory party, let alone in the nation as a whole, firmly into the file marked “history”, where we historians can argue over them, while practical people of politics can get on with the business of trying to win elections. Which was, of course, something she understood.

Tagged in:
  • creggancowboy

    Blair was Thatcher Lite and his stripping of civil liberty echoed Orgreave, Long Kesh and the Malvinas debacle – ZaNuLabour no different to Tories

  • blackfirscharlie

    You have to admire the complete and utter cynicism with which the Tories first exploited the death of six children and then initiated a cry-fest for the death of a leader they so readily stabbed in the back with a view to the forthcoming local elections. Rentoul dismisses the Thatcher effect too readily, there are thousands of people whose lives were horribly blighted by this odious woman and cannot neatly place her in a history file like some past newspaper copy. Cameron has said we are Thatcherites now. I bloody well hope not!

  • Pacificweather

    A good article John to show us that you can produce them when you want to do so. I agree about the Bishop’s address and that wasn’t the only good part of it. It was well balanced and concentrated on the person not the politician.

  • porkfright

    Exactly. Britain’s major problem today is underperforming, incompetent politicians-in other words-”No-one to vote for”.

  • creggancowboy

    Three shades of blue – and for legal reasons (Britain is a de facto police state) my last comment!

  • PurbeckPashmina

    De facto the Indie is still more nearly a trots’ playground.

  • creggancowboy

    Disagree – Lebedev Jnr wants an “upmarket” toy!

  • PurbeckPashmina

    Lots of trots are dullies and enjoy upmarket. Like you they find Labour is too practical, they prefer their protest. Some jumped from formal SWP to SDP, happening much the same again.

  • creggancowboy

    Labour practical? Internment without trial, ID cards, de Menezes?

Property search
Browse by area

Latest from Independent journalists on Twitter