A view from the ground in Sao Paulo as the protests in Brazil continue to rage

Ana Rocha
brazil 300x225 A view from the ground in Sao Paulo as the protests in Brazil continue to rage

(Getty Images)

Ana Rocha works for Christian Aid in Sao Paulo and is the Programme Officer for its Brazil programme

On Monday, I joined thousands on the streets of São Paulo to protest against the brutality used by Brazil’s military police as they confronted students demonstrating against rising bus fares. Thousands joined us across the world in support – 2,000 marched in Dublin, 600 in Berlin, as well as many more in other cities.

The initial protests, which began peacefully in São Paulo, quickly escalated. They spread to other cities across the country following a flurry of images and videos of violent police repression that were quickly shared through social media.

Monday’s demonstrations have since grown into a general expression of frustration and dissatisfaction with the country’s leaders, fuelled by the opposition parties. On Wednesday, another 50,000 took to the streets, just in São Paulo. People have continued to join the protests in over 100 cities across the country, leading to President Dilma Rousseff to call an emergency cabinet meeting to discuss the unrest.

The Confederations Cup, the FIFA football tournament between national teams, which started a week ago was supposed to celebrate Brazil’s hosting of the World Cup next year. Instead, it has turned into an opportunity for the people of Brazil to voice their anger at the amount of money being spent on both the World Cup and the 2016 Olympics, instead of essential services such as health, education and transport.

Although Brazil’s GDP these days is on a par with that of the UK, recent research by CEBRAP (the Brazilian Centre for Analysis and Planning) commissioned by Christian Aid revealed that it remains among the top 10 countries in the world for income inequality. About 40 per cent of the population lack access to rights, quality social policies or decent levels of employment, with 21.4 per cent, living below the World Bank’s national poverty line.

Demonstrators in Rio de Janeiro and Brasilia urged football fans to boycott next year’s games unless the government carries out urgent social reform. Relations between FIFA and Brazil are already tense, and unlikely to improve, especially with protestors demonstrating inside the stadiums.

During most of the protests, police reacted violently. In the most recent protests, there have been numerous accounts of undercover policemen actually sparking the vandalism and violence. Yet, this isn’t a new phenomenon. The United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights issued a statement in January calling on the Brazilian Government, “to take all necessary measures to guarantee the right to peaceful assembly; to prevent the disproportionate use of force during protests; to conduct prompt, thorough, independent and impartial investigations into reported excessive force”. And the latest Human Rights Watch report on Brazil also has a strong focus on public security and police conduct.

But still the use of police force continues, a reminder of the days when the country was run by a military dictatorship, which ruled from 1964 to 1985. There is now a very real fear that if they are not reined back, violence could spiral out of control. Christian Aid’s Brazilian partner organisations CONIC, MAB, MST and Gaspar Garcia have all condemned the police response and the apparent unwillingness of the authorities to enter into any kind of dialogue with the protesters.

It seems that repression is once again becoming standard in Brazilian society, with the claims of civil society met now with violence. Brazil has enjoyed constitutional rule for more than 25 years now, but with the right to demonstrate an alien concept to the forces of law and order, democracy, it is clear, is not yet consolidated.

This protest, which started with a 20 cents bus fare increase, is not just about the money involved, it is also about the rights generally of ordinary citizens. The right of access to health, for instance, depends on access to transportation, as well as education, and decent housing.

The fare increase has now been revoked, but with warnings other areas will suffer the consequences of the extra expenditure.
The protests that now continue, as well as celebrating that small victory over public transport, are an attempt to transform democratic practices and guarantee further dialogue over the public sector.

As the UN Special Rapporteur on adequate housing, Raquel Rolnik asked last week, ‘When was the population of São Paulo asked to decide if the subsidies for bus companies should be enlarged or resources invested in another area?

‘When was the population asked to share decisions about the investments in the city? This is a debate that the people want to engage in.’

Tagged in: , , , , , , ,
  • Zig

    Millions are spent to win hosting of the World Cup.
    Millions to billions are spent on hosting the event itself.

    Why cant FIFA change the way the hosts are selected?

    Every country who wants to host it, nominate them a numbered ball, draw the ball live.

    To showcase the interested countries, just knock a simple tourist video together showing the great landmarks and culture.

    Make it so any country winning the hosting, can’t enter again for another 16 years (four events) or more.

    Anyone wanting to host should have the funds mostly available to get the infrastructure/stadiums ready.

    FIFA should put aside some of the money from the previous World Cup to help fund the event, especially where it concerns single use stadiums.

    I mean, wtf do FIFA need with a billion? The game is smeared with greed.
    Just remember, FIFA are an extremely rich organisation, with licensing deals they have with broadcasters, video games, anything printed including, believe it or not, something as simple as fixture lists. (seriously, set up a website and show a team’s fixture list, you will be sued for copyright infringement if you didn’t pay for a license first).

    Brazil has a high poverty problem. I side totally with the Brazilian people on this.

  • Henrique

    works for the “christian aid” what a neutral point of view she might have…the independent should look for more balanced point of views other than the right-wingish…

Most viewed



Property search
Browse by area

Latest from Independent journalists on Twitter