The Other Myths About David Kelly
Sadly, Professor Alastair Hay, in dismissing the conspiracy theory that his friend David Kelly was murdered 10 years ago today, succeeds only in making matters worse.
The idea that Dr Kelly was murdered is demonstrable nonsense, but unfortunately Professor Hay lends credence to more pernicious myths about his friend’s death – more pernicious because they are not so obviously mistaken.
Indeed, that the Hutton report was in some way unsatisfactory, and that Dr Kelly was “hounded” to his death by the Government, have been the accepted version of events for a decade, and so it is almost impossible to ask people to look again at the evidence and assess whether the truth might be different.
This is not helped by the relentless misrepresentation of important facts that are made to fit the conventional view. In the Daily Telegraph’s report of Professor Hay’s words this morning, for example, Neil Tweedie says, “Referring to Dr Kelly’s belief that there was no evidence of WMD in Iraq …”
It ought to be well known that Dr Kelly believed “it is about 30 per cent likely there was a chemical weapons programme in the six months before the war and considerably more likely that there was a biological weapons programme” (as confirmed by Dr Kelly to the Foreign Affairs Committee of MPs, 15 July 2003).
It ought to be better known that Dr Kelly supported military action against Saddam’s regime, and had written, days before the invasion:
The long-term threat, however, remains Iraq’s development to military maturity of weapons of mass destruction – something that only regime change will avert.
It also ought to be better known, as I wrote earlier this week, that Dr Kelly, who seems to have thought, rightly, that the “45 minutes” point should not have been in the September 2002 dossier, must have been dismayed to have had his words used by the BBC to publish an untrue and damaging story. Presumably, Dr Kelly knew that the “45 minutes” error was the responsibility of senior spies rather than politicians. And it ought to be better known that, if he was “hounded”, it was by journalists.
I have tried to give a fair and balanced account in the updated edition of my biography of Tony Blair (there is an extract here; download the e-book here or buy the paperback here). But I fear that the accepted mythology is so deeply ingrained that it will not be dispelled, if ever, for many decades.Tagged in: david kelly
Recent Posts on Eagle Eye
- Cameron and Modi bond as they woo some 60,000 overseas Indians at Wembley
- Modi tries to revamp his battered image as he flies to London
- Big defeat for India's Narendra Modi just before UK visit
- Mark Carney is compromising the Bank of England’s independence
- Do the latest GDP revisions vindicate Osborne's austerity?
Latest from Independent journalists on Twitter