Blogs

Women in Science: Secrets of the ice – How the toughest organisms on earth are responding to environmental change.

Antartica 300x174 Women in Science: Secrets of the ice   How the toughest organisms on earth are responding to environmental change.

(Getty Images)

Dr Cath Waller is a lecturer in Marine Ecology at the Centre for Environmental and Marine Sciences  (CEMS) at the University of Hull. Originally trained as an architect Cath finally settled down to become an Antarctic scientist about ten years ago. She was hoping for a PhD somewhere warm and on a species she could eat at the end of the research. Instead she was offered PhD in Antarctica. Surprising herself, she took to the frozen continent like a penguin to an iceberg.  Cath research involves studying small things living on or under rocks around the Antarctic Peninsula and surrounding islands.  This is one of the fastest warming places on the globe. She is interested in how  invertebrates arrive and survive in this hostile environment and how they may cope under rapidly changing conditions. She has made several  trips “South” and the “lure of the little voices” keeps calling her back to the ice. Cath took part in Soapbox Science 2013, on 5th July where she stood on a soapbox on London’s Southbank and spoke to the public about her work and to help promote the role of women in science. www.soapboxscience.org

Next year is the 100th Anniversary of the start of the Imperial Transantarctic Expedition lead by Sir Ernest Shackleton. When asked why he was heading back to the frozen continent he said: “Men go out into the void spaces of the world for various reasons. Some are actuated simply by a love of adventure, some have the keen thirst for scientific knowledge, and others again are drawn away from the trodden paths by the ‘lure of the little voices,’ the mysterious fascination of the unknown.”

Antarctic science started in the “Heroic Age of Antarctic Exploration” of the early 1900s. Apsley Cherry-Garrard and colleagues undertook a gruelling trek through horrendous conditions in the Antarctic  winter of 1911 to collect Emperor penguin eggs. They hoped that they would provide the evolutionary link between birds and reptiles. (They did not). Most Antarctic research is much younger, born of international collaboration started in the International Geophysical year of 1957-8 and developed through the aegis of the Antarctic Treaty.

I am an Antarctic ecologist. I have, as Shackelton so eloquently put it, both a keen thirst for scientific knowledge and the urge to follow the call of the little voices. My science is a young science, being both Antarctic and ecology. The British Ecological society was founded in 1913 , the first of its kind, yet established much later than most scientific societies (The Royal Society was formed in 1660).

Superficially, ecology appears to be a relatively simple science. It is defined as “the branch of biology that deals with organisms’ relations to one another and to the physical environment in which they live”. Trying to understand how this actually happens is like trying to solve an incredibly complex three dimensional jigsaw of  constantly changing patterns.

The complexity of ecosystems and the lack of a clear understanding of the underlying structuring mechanisms has led to the position of ecologists being likened to that of the inorganic chemists before the development of the periodic table. However things are changing and our understanding of the processes has advanced significantly over the last few decades, with the development of  mathematical theories to help describe the complicated variability in ecological community structure.

One aspect of my research is to try to understand the Antarctic intertidal zone. What lives there and how it survives. Children all over the world play on the beach and interact with some of the amazing animals living in rock pools. Globally the intertidal zone has been intensively studied  and has been the testing ground for many generally accepted ecological theories, proposed by some of the giants in ecological research. But south of the Antarctic circumpolar current it is virtually unknown and until very recently was considered almost lifeless (not true).

Surviving in the intertidal zone requires species living there be able to deal with marine conditions when the tide is in yet also be able to cope with terrestrial conditions when the tide is out (desiccation due to sunlight in summer, freezing air temperatures in winter) . Antarctic intertidal species have to deal with all of this and more. In winter the intertidal zone is encased in ice, in summer the ice melts and scrapes across the beaches scouring the rocks clean; and air temperatures can be well below zero degrees Celsius. But a much greater threat than this is the effects of climate change. On the Antarctic Peninsula mean air temperatures have risen by  around 3°C over the last 50 years  and sea surface temperatures by around 1°C. Iceshelves  are collapsing and almost 90 per cent of the glaciers are retreating.

For marine animals that have evolved over millions of  years to survive in temps of -1.8 to + 1.8oC this is potentially catastrophic. At the moment we don’t really know how the vast majority of Antarctic marine invertebrates will adapt to these rapidly changing conditions, or indeed if they can. And that is bad  news for the rest of the Southern ocean ecosystem as these animals  are key components of  the food web which culminates in higher predators such as whales, penguins and seals.

Because intertidal species are the toughest of the tough they could be the ones that can tell us something about how this ecosystem may respond to  a rapidly changing world.

Tagged in:
  • mememine

    What denier would debate a crisis being called; “eventual” and “unavoidable” instead of just “possible” and “likely”?
    This costly debate to save the planet will end when the experts finally agree climate change WILL be, not just “COULD BE” an inevitable crisis. What has to happen now after 28 years of denier resistance for science to issue a warning that says it will happen instead of agreeing it might happen?

  • greggf

    A far as I know meme, “deniers” do not deny the climate is changing but the cause.
    There are a great number of natural occurring candidates for the causes including solar activity, polar axial precession and Milankovitch cycles; the latter two of which, by the way, can be traced with some co-incidence to the last ice-ages.
    And as a tax-payer I find it offensive and opportunistic of governments to demand taxation for one particular alleged cause.

  • Anteaus

    I suggest you study the science and draw your own conclusions.

    Measurements suggest that warming has paused or ceased since 2000 or thereabouts. Alarmists say this is because heat is going into the oceans, but can offer no explanation why that should happen.

    Well-accepted theory says that a doubling of carbon dioxide can only cause a degree Celsius or so of warming.

    Wood’s Experiment shows that ‘greenhouse effect’ results from trapped convection, not from trapped infrared. (and it matters not what traps the infrared, glass or gases, it has only a small effect on temperature anyway)

    Firsthand observation suggests that the same principle applies to the atmosphere – clouds retain heat at night, clear skies do not. The major greenhouse effect is due to clouds, not CO2.

    The alarmists invoke ‘positive feedbacks’ to transform the small effect of CO2 into a catastrophic rise, but cannot explain why the supposed feedbacks would not be triggered by the ten times larger daily and seasonal temperature changes the Earth experiences anayway.

    Ice cores show that ancient carbon dioxide levels rose after temperature increases, not before as was once assumed.

    Historical sunspot records show a much closer correlation between solar activity and temperature than exists between carbon dioxide and temperature.

    I could go on, but I think that should be enough to convince most people that there is something very wrong with cAGW dogma. It fits neither the theory nor the observed facts of the Earth’s climate.


Property search
Browse by area

Latest from Independent journalists on Twitter