The old are better educated than the young
This story was “all over the BBC” apparently, but I missed it and it doesn’t seem to have been in the newspapers. It was in the OECD’s Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC), which was published on 8 October. You would have thought the hell-in-handcarters (handcart, pictured) would have leapt on this paragraph as evidence that the country is indeed going to the dogs:
In England, adults aged 55-65 perform better than 16-24 year-olds in both literacy and numeracy. In fact, England is the only country where the oldest age group has higher proficiency in both literacy and numeracy than the youngest age group, after other factors, such as gender, socio-economic backgrounds and type of occupations, are taken into account.
The survey was of 8,892 adults aged 16 to 65 in England and Northern Ireland, carried out in 2011-12. It therefore compares older people whose school education (ages five to 15 or 16) was between 1951 and 1973, with young people who started at school in 1992 or later.
In England, people in the 55+ age group scored more highly than the youngest, while in Northern Ireland it was the other way round, but the survey says that “the differences are very small”. Even so, the Daily Mail could have made a two-page spread out of the contrast between the golden age of English schooling, from Florence Horsburgh, Minister of Education in 1951, to Margaret Thatcher, Secretary of State in 1973, and the lawless dystopia inaugurated by John Patten, appointed in 1992.Tagged in: education
Recent Posts on Eagle Eye
- Cameron and Modi bond as they woo some 60,000 overseas Indians at Wembley
- Modi tries to revamp his battered image as he flies to London
- Big defeat for India's Narendra Modi just before UK visit
- Mark Carney is compromising the Bank of England’s independence
- Do the latest GDP revisions vindicate Osborne's austerity?
Latest from Independent journalists on Twitter