You are here : Home » Extra Time Home

 Subscribe to RSS

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

« Sri Lanka 2007: Thoughts turning to Galle | Main | Sri Lanka 2007: Umpires as the players' friends »

10 December 2007

Comments

Angus Fraser

It is, they have not allowed the perceived injustices of yesterday affect their approach. When Collingwood went early this morning I feared the worst - England being bowled up for fewer than 300. But Prior and Sidebottom got stuck in.

Prior is once again looking the part. Where are all those doubters who said he should go at the end of the India Test series. We ask a lot of keepers. They have to bat and be able to play shots because quite often they are in with the tail when boundaries are needed. Sidebottom just continues to impress. He is a wholehearted cricketer and he deserves everything that comes his way.

The Sangakkara dismissal shows that any batsman is suscpetible to a good length ball on off-stump that leaves him either in the air or off the pitch.

What do you think of Broad - two warnings for running on the pitch in your first five overs of Test cricket is not good is it?

Stephen Brenkley

Was going to ask you about that. Umpire Aleem Dar got it exactly right. Broad was doing it from the off. I think they're allowed enough leeway, aren't they with that imaginary line five metres in front of the popping crease? Two points arise: was it First Test nerves or is it a fault for which he has a predilection and should have been spotted. One more warning and he's off for the innings. How hard is it for long-legged, close to the wicket quick bowlers, I wonder.

Angus Fraser

For a bowler it is a nightmare. It happens more when bowling to left handers because you aim slightly across the pitch and your momentum takes you in that direction. I thought Dar handled the situation very well. He was not over officious and he was trying to work with the bowler but sooner or later he had to do something. Perhaps Broad should have gone round the wicket after one warning.

I think it is a problem for him. In the one-day series he bowled from wide of the crease, now we know why. He needs to get closer if he can for lbw's and to swing the ball away from right handers not angle it in. That is why, despite his talent, he is still work in progress.

Stephen Brenkley

All true. He's probably got to bowl wide of the crease for the rest of this innings, or risk immediate trouble. It is to be supposed that he will change ends to where Daryl Harper is standing. Talking of nightmares it would certainly be one for England if Broad couldn't bowl again in the innings. Five bowlers in your side would help that, of course (let's not start that again). England could do with two more wickets, including Mahela Jayawardene before close and it will have been a good day.

Angus Fraser

Thye could. Stephen Harmison has started well and he would get plenty of overs if Broad transgresses again. Dar is very particular on bowlers running on, he warned Harmison off in Antigua in 2004 when Lara got 400*.

The only problem with bowling at Harper's end is that his antennae have been raised, although he has other things to worry about.

Without wishing to open up a bag of worms again, what did you think of the third umpire decision for the catch against Sidebottom?

Stephen Brenkley

When Harmison was warned off in Antigua, having bowled quite spendidly on the flattest pitch ever devised by man, Lara had something like 372. Daryl certainly should have more things to think about. I thought he was at fault this morning. He referred a decision on a slip catch to the third umpire because he was in doubt whether it had touched the ground. In fact, it was nowhere near the ground and was given not out by the third umpire because it had touched Sidebottom's shoulder not his bat. Daryl is paid to see that and if he can't well .... the ICC selectors may need to have a re-think. The correct decision was reached but if everything was referred as you said yesterday games would take an unconscionable time, more batsmen would probably be out and we may as well play some virtual form of cricket on our lap tops. Daryl at least smiled when he referred the appeal, but he must be feeling the pressure, and perhaps be losing his nerve slightly.

Angus Fraser

When the ICC assess their umpires they keep coming back with 90% correct decision rates. Harper is a decent bloke and the players like his personality but he has to get decisions right.

There are a lot of people who want the game to go down the technology route and a couple of responses yesterday suggest that every appeal does not have to go back. Okay, not every appeal has to but the majority would if you want to try to eliminate error completely.

I know television pays millions but the most important spectators are those in the ground and they have to be catered for. Empty grounds and games shown just to fill television time is not a good advert for the game.

Stephen Brenkley

The idea of Tests only being played to fill TV time could, as you know, form the basis of a discussion down the line. As you know, I'm very worried indeed about the level of Test crowds at all games not involving England (yes, even in India). Without crowds it becomes less of a television event and before you know it we are in Twenty20 Wonderland (or Hell) depending on your viewpoint. As for umpires, I often think the ICC errs on the upward side, but they have to strive always to increase standards. You're right, Harper seeems a jolly good chap, loves the game, liked by players but the best umpires are Taufel, Dar, Rauf and Benson with the rest somewhere behind. And England still need a wicket. Poor Monty can't seem to get his length right.

Angus Fraser

Monty's bowling hasn't been particularly inspiring throughout the tour. Sri Lankan batsmen do play spin very well but there seems to be something missing. I suppose we could be guilty of taking him granted. He is only young and therefore open to occasional inconsistency. harmison has taken over 200 Test wickets and we don't know what we are going to get from one day to another with him.

Jayawardene is a lovely player to watch - so graceful. England need to get him before the close. He too likes batting for a long time.

Stephen Brenkley

It may be worth saying - and you may disagree - that Broad, despite his difficulties in follow through, assembled two rather good spells. Some wheels, made 'em play, as they say. If Mahela was to bat until tea time tomorrow, England would be in trouble, but the aesthetic rewards would be ample compensation. He has exquisite touch and movement.

Angus Fraser

I agree - Broad looked good. You'd never have guessed it was his Test debut - he looked composed and confident, which are good signs. He could have had a wicket two but the ball kept falling in to gaps.

Harmison hasn't been too bad but it's not 2004 again.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment