Last week, at a cafe in Anjuna Beach that specialises in organic food, the mother of Scarlett Keeling showed me some photographs that I didn't really want to see.
The photographs were taken during the first post-mortem tests carried out on Scarlett and unlike the written report itself, the photographs revealed the true extent of the teenager's injuries. The pictures showed a huge bruise above one eye, a series of bruises on her legs and shins, red marks around the genital area and, most shocking of all, a picture of Scarlett's face.
Because police claimed they did know who she was when her body was
found, the pathologists had cut open her face to enable access to her
teeth and to take a dental imprint to obtain her identity. They had
then crudely sewn it back up. What was left looked like an horrendous,
clown-like smile stitched across the teenager's face.
The images - the last one in particular - haunted me all week. The
one shown above is the least horrendous. Scarlett's mother, Fiona
MacKeown, wanted me and a colleague to see them not for dramatic
effect, but to reveal what she believed was a police cover-up. It seems
now she was correct in her hunch.
Mrs MacKeown said she had been required to examine her daughter's
body on three separate occasions, the first in an utter state of shock.
She spoke of the awfulness of standing there with a group of strangers
- male police officers - as the sheet covering her daughter's body was
thrown back. It was clear that Mrs MacKeown found it hard to talk about
the experience.
I write this now, partly in response to the large number of comments my previous blog posting attracted,
but also because of some of the ludicrous comments in some parts of the
media suggesting Mrs MacKeown is not only irresponsible but also
insufficiently grief-stricken.
Frankly I find the aggression and spite that has been directed
towards the mother hard to fathom. No one thinks for a moment that she
was right to leave her daughter in the care of a tour-guide, no one
thinks it is correct for a 15-year-old to be wandering around a beach
at night possibly drunk and with strange men and no one thinks Mrs
MacKeown displayed anything approaching common-sense.
On those points, we are all agreed. But I am surprised not only by
the lack of compassion for Mrs MacKeown, but also the holier-than-thou
attitudes that many people have expressed. I am far from being the
reckless type, but I cannot myself help thinking back to the number of
mad, stupid, irresponsible things I've done over the years that could
so very easily have ended in disaster and which - had the outcome been
played out under the full glare of the media - would have left me
looking utterly foolish. I suspect we all have.
People deal with grief in different ways; I am sure that Mrs
MacKeown is struggling to deal with hers while having to fight for an
appropriate response from the Goan police who I suspect - like so many
commentators - have little time for her because she has tattoos and
dresses in hippy clothes.
Personally, I hope that Mrs MacKeown will be left with some happy memories of her daughter, but I suspect also she will forever carry with her those terrible images taken in the autopsy room, the images of a life cut short.


You're right that there's no call for people to be downright nasty about this - as with the McCanns, people tend to forget that she's not the criminal in their rush to judge. When I was 15, I spent most of the day on a school trip on Bastille Day in Paris wandering around by myself. Something could, on reflection, have happened. What actually happened was that I had my first experience of being treated and respected like an adult that I wouldn't do anything daft. 15 is quite old nowadays. It's not like being 15 40 years ago.
Posted by: jane | Wednesday, 12 March 2008 at 11:23 AM
Enough, of this whinghing. This lady should be booked for negligence by UK authorities and her benefits for breeding kids should be stopped(she seems to be a baby manufacturing unit without any conscience).
As for Goa it will be better of without this druggie hippies
for good. The Goa police have done a great job by nabbing the criminal. Kudos to them.
Posted by: Mark | Wednesday, 12 March 2008 at 11:58 AM
Lets get back to parental basics here. The McCanns and now Mrs. MacKeown both failed key tests of parental responsibility in terms of supervision and duty of care. Both Maddie and Scarlett are the victims of this. Both would be alive if the parents had acted with greater responsibility.
Luckily 95% of parents DO act in the interests of their children, day in and day out.
Posted by: Vivas | Wednesday, 12 March 2008 at 12:46 PM
@ Mark and Vivas - are you telling me your children are with you 100% of the time, day and night? Come on, it's difficult to know where to draw the line but everybody lets their children play out of their sight, everybody leaves their kids in the car for a few seconds. You don't tie them to your trousers 24/7. OK, you need to exercise some common sense, but you also need to show a little humanity towards those who have got unlucky.
Posted by: Sophie | Wednesday, 12 March 2008 at 01:27 PM
This poor young girl really never stood a chance. She is exactly the sort of girl that men like those responsible pray on. Obviously her mother is not resposnible for her death. But she has a duty of care towards her children and had she taken her parental duties as seriously as most people do, none of this would have happened. Her daughter should have been tucked up in bed at 2 am not drinking in a bar without any supervision. It seems to me that people think that just because they are abroad, in a fancy resort the same parental responsibilties do not apply. I really do not believe that the McCann's would have left 3 children under the age of 4 in their Leicester home alone while they went out for dinner. Anyway.... what was a 15 year old who should be in full-time education doing on a 6 month holiday in Goa???
Posted by: NATASA | Wednesday, 12 March 2008 at 01:32 PM
Most parents tell their children the same thing - don't compromise yourself. Scarlett was old enough to know that she would be courting disaster if she was drunk and high and wandering around in the early hours by herself. Perhaps though, coming from her background, she was unaware of those dangers. She took a great risk and paid a heavy price.
Posted by: Rose | Wednesday, 12 March 2008 at 01:32 PM
@Sophie
Cut the crap, a 6 month vacation for a 15 year old, with added bonus of alcohol, drugs and partying. Way to go that seems like ideal parenting to you. Even a billionaire will think a hundred times before spoiling his kids like this.
The best place for Scarlett was in school and its shocking that this lady claims that 6 months in Goa was the best school education she could buy.
Posted by: Mark | Wednesday, 12 March 2008 at 01:55 PM
This is great...to cover-up her(Fiona) own negligence (of leaving her daughter alone, taking a vacation when every other child her daughter's age goes to school, allowing her kids to booze, drugs and what not), she thought it would be better to blame the police for their's. Now, she accuses police of cover-up & corruption!! Think practically, if the police in Goa were that smart & honest as she expects them to be, it's her & her drunkard/drug addict daugter that would be behind bars for doing drugs/abetting drug usage.
Posted by: santosh | Wednesday, 12 March 2008 at 02:16 PM
“No, one should not feel in this manner that India is a TOURIST – UNFRIENDLY NATION. Government of India is giving various facilities for tourists in different States. Such tourist states or tourist places are being defamed by certain bad elements. One may feel that it is only because of law & order situation in the country and particularly on such tourist spots/states.
Matter has been raised in Parliament of India and some of the female parliamentarians also felt that a Notification be issued to foreign countries for not sending their female children alone to India as tourists, about which I myself feel will not be a healthy practice, if foreign nationals are instructed in such a manner.
Nodoubt that media plays a bigger role, but the statements of the Hon’ble Chief Minister of the States where any crime occurs should contain sympathetic views about the family of victim instead of blaming the members of the family of victims, as such statements increases fire in the minds of public in general and specifically in the minds of members of family of victims.
However, inspite of some incidents with tourists in a few states, this can not be alleged that India is a tourist-unfriendly nation as India was a Tourist-Friendly Nation, India is a Tourist-Friendly Nation, and India will remain a Tourist-Friendly Nation”.
From:
NARESH SARIN,
Posted by: Naresh Sarin | Wednesday, 12 March 2008 at 02:51 PM
both arguments are correct- why cannot they be?
on the one hand the goan police have handled this one very badly, thinking it was just one more death of a hippie nobody would miss. they should be brought to account and the killer punished. linked to this should be a clean up of goa, some parts of which have become a paradise for drugs gangs and paedophiles.
on the other hand scarlett's mother has to be held accountable for her own actions. first and foremost her other children should be flown back to england to be assessed by social services.
this is something fiona mackeown will have to live with but the universal feeling seems to be that she is equally culpable in this sad series of events which culminated in the death of a vulnerable young girl.
Posted by: kris | Wednesday, 12 March 2008 at 02:57 PM
Andrew Buncombe you are totally mad and invading privacy by printing this picture of this poor girl on the web - i guess if we did not have such laws in this country you would have put the picture of her face on there too. I am glad that so many people have seen your article as total crap and nonsense and to compare this with the McCann case is stupid. Of course the McCann's feel bad about leaving their daughter but they did it in an innocent way, in a protected holiday place with security all around. Scarlett was thrown to the wolves. Of course everyone who has commented on this blog feels compassion for Mrs MacKeon and this horrible event but it is heartfelt and IMPORTANT that people make it clear that Scarlett was abandoned and we do not approve. This is a good sign of human nature and thank god most people take care of their children. In the case of many kids in this country being in danger to drugs even at school this cannot be compared either. Mrs Mackeon dumped her daughter in to an environment that is well known for its drugs and exploitation. She was not ignorant. This was a mistake and gave her daughter a much higher chance of being vulnerable. It is a warning to others too and the parents who are out in Goa right now with their kids. You are not a good journalist.
Posted by: Brigitta | Wednesday, 12 March 2008 at 03:03 PM
Brigitta, Just to clarify in regard to to the matter of of the invasion of Scarlett's privacy. Maybe in a sense we all are invading her privacy but the photographs from the autopsy - one of which is on this blog - were released to the press by the family.
Posted by: Andrew Buncombe | Wednesday, 12 March 2008 at 03:14 PM
if i wanted to take my children on a six month "educational" holiday to india goa would be the very last place on my list of must see places. it has developed a seedy reputation over the years and the authorities have turned a blind eye to the criminal presence simply because they bring in tourist revenue. how else can you explain the nigerian drug gangs which operate openly in tandem with the local gangsters? or the sex trade which includes child sex. it is time for the indian authorities to open their eyes and to reach the logical decision that they do not want the hippie type tourist anymore. once this decision is reached a proper clean up can follow.
this is daydreaming, of course. none of this will actually be done and the druggies, perverts and paedos will continue to flock to goa. goa does not deserve this. it is paradise ruined by greed. scarlett was a victim of this system.
Posted by: kris | Wednesday, 12 March 2008 at 03:21 PM
naresh sarin, are you with the indian high commission by any chance?
yes, india is a tourist friendly country but the authorities need to wake up to the fact that goa has been ruined by the wrong type of tourist. we do not need this scum and we do not need their money. we can easily attract the right type of tourist by cleaning up our act.
the so called honourable chief minister should get his finger out and order a crack down on the drugs and prostitution gangs which are rife in goa. only a complete clean up will ensure that the rapes and murders, which are beginning to increase in numbers, come down. but no. the honourable chief minister will simply make the right noises in delhi whilst the ground reality in goa will remain unaltered. it is a shame. goa and goans deserve better.
Posted by: kris | Wednesday, 12 March 2008 at 03:40 PM
Andrew i think you are in shock from this horrible thing and you needed to share it with the blog to offload the horror of it. The mother has met her own terrible fate of what happens when you are naive and stupid and do not think. Look at her and how she lives her life! Why can't we judge? She could live as she does if she was single but not as a mother i am sorry. She is now uncovering the even worst sleeze and filth that she never imagined and so she has to get the press involved to let the world know about this cess pit system of Indian corrupt police etc etc and her horror of the death of her daughter. What a terrible way to learn this lesson. Goa was always a dangerous place for a single woman never mind a 15 year old. Again the question - what was she thinking? as for journalism, i think you have got emotionally involved which makes you lacking in objectivity and not being able to accurately see the truth (I don't blame you you are human after all).
Posted by: Brigitta | Wednesday, 12 March 2008 at 03:43 PM
@Kris
Good one mate, Goa doesn't deserve hippies, its time the big companies are allowed to takeover Goa and convert the public beaches into private beaches, where this drug trafficking does not take place.
Goa is one of the most unregulated tourist destinations in the world, its a free for all democracy, where everything is left to the people. The Goan people themselves are sick of the tourists who completely disrespect orthodox Goan catholic traditions.
The Goa government has given sufficient warnings to tourists to avoid drugs, avoid swimming at particular places, not to go around nude, but the tourists completely
disregard the Government warnings and do whatever they want.
Posted by: ashley | Wednesday, 12 March 2008 at 03:45 PM
it is just this free for all that has led to goa's downfall. it started off simply as tolerance of the strange but snowballed into a monster of sleaze and debauchery of the worst type. it has attracted the worst type of human being from all over the world and scarlett has become it's latest victim.
ordinary tourists are often dismayed at what they see in goa but without leadership from the top it does not look like changing anytime soon. I would have thought that in the new economic climate the indians would want to change the image of goa for the better. there is no better time than now to embark upon a course of action which will change goa's tourist landscape for the better. better for the tourists, better for goa and better for india as a whole.
Posted by: kris | Wednesday, 12 March 2008 at 04:19 PM
I agree with you Kris and by the way, western governments should be taking note because it is these kind of people that are all over our society and making it really bad. Where ever they go in the world they bring it down.
Posted by: Brigitta | Wednesday, 12 March 2008 at 04:35 PM
The idiots here who are critising the poor mother of a child who has recently been raped and murdered, are unbelievable.
She did not abandon her child, or commit anything close to a crime.
She simply trusted people she had known some time, she trusted the wrong people, she did not leave Scarlett alone at all.
Anyway, such comments about her are simply a tactic to deflect from the hideous truth of a child being raped and murdered in India, in a holiday resort.
People who are focusing on fault finding the mother are probably just not strong enough to handle the truth, luckily Scarlett Keelings mother appears to be a strong woman who will not be rail roaded by this kind of nonsense.
I wish her every success in bringing the corrupt Indian authorities to task on this and who knows, may even wake some people up to the atrocious attitude towards Western women in India.
Poor Scarlett, for her sake, lets keep focused on the real problem in this matter.
Posted by: Clare Ross | Wednesday, 12 March 2008 at 09:25 PM
One more thing if Westerners fall prey to drug dealers that abide in Goa, then it is not the tourists who are the problem, it is the drug dealers, and unless Indian authorities focus on their real problem, instead of trying to paint their own place as some kind of spiritual paradise, and faced up to the fact that it is overrun by crooks, corrupt officials who are preying on tourists, then yet again it is another case of them being unable to face facts and the truth and sort things out properly.
Even in Jagannath Puri, supposedly a Holy City, drugs are rife, in fact legal and sold openly in government shops there. I was shocked and saddened when I visited, to find majority of Pujaris off their heads on bhang.
So before pointing the finger at tourists, the officials and others critising tourists might try looking a little closer to home.
Posted by: Clare Ross | Wednesday, 12 March 2008 at 09:35 PM
Many things were not how it should have been in this horrific incident.
It's only now that India tries sell it's sprituality taking cues for decades, when westerners landed up and chose to stay among the filthiest options in India, to be in tune with spirituality!! (in places most Indians would think many times about,... given a choice). Drugs, nudity and indiscreet sex came with it.
Many western people have felt good about themselves by turning a blind eye to a section of India which has for years lived off them and being under the psycological spell of most un'holymen' of India. They have seeked bliss (for decades) in such conditions.
India does not have answers to the emptiness of hearts. Neither do these people. So please wake up. India is a not a spiritual mystical place of your fantasy. Its is a real place where ordinary people live abd behave just like they do in your country.
Posted by: nilanj | Thursday, 13 March 2008 at 05:05 AM
Clare you suck, western women should first learn to read english and follow the government directives, if they deliberately do drugs, drink alcohol (just because its dirt cheap) then it is not the government's fault.
Why can't these women stick to European beaches and pay in pounds and euros for their share of weed and booze, why come
to Goa to ruin the peace of poor Goan people.
Posted by: Rocky | Thursday, 13 March 2008 at 06:50 AM
oh right...a woman with 7 kids by different men does not know that perhaps her beautiful 15 year old daughter is in danger when left alone in one of the most notorious places in India for drugs, sex and debauchery. Clare is naive. She is living in la la land where all the do-gooders and politically correct people live in this country and who create havoc in society with their stupid ideas of letting everyone off the hook. Sorry darling, but you can get away with living like that neglectful mother in a country where they hand out benefits and council houses to all and sundry but take your brood to a place like Goa when you are a dosser and see what happens. Actually Goa is a fantastic place, people are brilliant but the westerners went there in the hippee days for drugs, sex and spiritual stuff and it got ruined because all the dark stuff started happening, like it does in Bali and other places where the druggies go. Proper tourism will cover it up more but prostitution will happen then and other such things. Wake up Clare, you are living in a land where you can take risks, you can't take risks in a place like Goa and especially with children.
Posted by: len | Thursday, 13 March 2008 at 08:35 AM
First thing that people coming to India should realise that they are in South Asia where a single woman travelling alone and behaving in a bohemian fashion is under threat of being considered as a woman of easy virtues making her a target for unscrupulous people. Add drugs and late unescorted nights to that and you have a ready made cocktail for disaster.
Its sad that a girl lost her lfe but the tragedy was of her own making, you cant play with fire without getting burnt.
Posted by: luckyluke | Thursday, 13 March 2008 at 09:01 AM
now Janet Street porter is defending the mother in her article...of course she would - this is the woman who thinks Kate Moss is cool with all the cocaine snorting etc and she is a mother to a little girl too. What is wrong with the commentators in this country? Where are the values?
Posted by: len | Thursday, 13 March 2008 at 09:18 AM
I really don't understand what all this noise is about. A girl was raped and murdered. period. happens all over the world. Why is her mother being put in the dock is beyond me. Scarlett was 15...not a baby.
And all you good westerners ranting about all the drugs and sleaze...it is you who started it in the first place. Most foriegners come to india and particularly goa only for drugs. And what's with this unsafe goa nonsense. Any lady here who would like to take a walk at 2 in the night in the Bronx? I'd love to see that. Every place is unsafe if you don't follow the rules and show some common sense
I agree with luke...you play with fire and you run the risk of getting burned. 2 in the night...full of booze and dope...in the company of strange men...hell i get nervous just thinking about it.
She's dead and it's over. And mark my words...another scarlett is soon to come....then another...then another
And btw the image on top....those wounds don't seem to have been inflicted. Those are puncture wounds...probably from washing up on the rocks.
Posted by: ydobonmai | Thursday, 13 March 2008 at 10:07 AM
I took my 12 year old daughter to India last year and found myself being ultra-protective of her. I made sure she was dresed very demurely and was in a sense surrounded at all times. Partly because she attracted alot of stares, partly because it seemed to fit in with the local mores ie how the local people treated their own daughters.
I completely agree that teenagers cannot be watched at all times and that sometimes risks have to be taken to ensure that they slowly feel the weight of adulthood. This poor family misjudged the situation and will have to live with the consequences of losing their daughter and sister for the rest of their lives. Sadly, pious rating wont bring her back.
Have you really never left a child in a situation that could have become dangerous? Right...
Posted by: catherine | Thursday, 13 March 2008 at 10:42 PM
There are certain things here that i have observed,
1.The combination of drugs like lsd,ecstasy,and cocaine by themselves are enough to cause cardio-respiratory arrest.The barmen gave her drugs,raped her and maybe even physically assaulted her but they do not appear to have intentionally killed her.She became unconsious and they merely left her there.She must have died from choking in the sand and water.
2.There are no drug mafia or highlevel coverups involved here.These guys were small time drug peddlers.Both the autopsy doctors and the police were least interested in investigating because for them she was just another drugged out junkie who got what she deserved and thats why they did not bother to check on the brusies and quickly dismissed it as drowning.This is merely a case of lazy incompetant people who are unaware of what they are supposed to do and not because they have been paid off by politicians or mafia.
3.This masala mike guy a fellow briton at the bar knew that she was high on drugs,had no money to go home,was only a minor and was being exploited by the barmen.Still this guy did not have the decency to give her a lift or drop her home.
4.Equally appalling is the boyfriend julio who failed to check on her when she had not come home even at 4 am especially since she was a minor and was staying with him.
5.Scarletts mother may or maynot have been guilty of negligence but the way she has fought to bring the truth out and the dignity with which she has conducted herself after her daughters death is examplery and speaks of courage.
6.Scarlett was just a typical teenager looking to have as much fun as possible. Most people like dinking smoking and sex at this age but the poor thing paid a heavy price for her easy going atitude.
7.Having nine children from five different people is most unusual especially when you live very modestly.I suspect that fiona intentionally had so many children for the child benefits.
8.Iam certain that with all this attention the case has generated goa is certainly going to be a more safer place for foreign tourists.Foreigners themselves will behave more carefully and police also will become more effecient.
--------- Rocky Reddy.
Posted by: rocky reddy | Friday, 14 March 2008 at 09:24 PM
Hopefully now the authorities will wake up and clear Goa of all the scum - half nude and immoral hippies, drugs, raves etc. When we last visited Goa, we observed several white women moving around in compromising ways with the local Goan studs- obviously the older ones pay for it and the younger ones sell it. Goa,one of the most beautiful beaches in India, is sadly no longer inviting to the indian tourist who has to go to all the way to langkawi, singapore, or bali for a decent beach holiday.
Posted by: early bird | Saturday, 15 March 2008 at 09:05 AM
Yet again, a child is raped and murdererd and abused because she has an irresponsible, selfish, negligent british mother.
British mothers really are the worst in europe - selfish, greedy, drunken, promiscuous, obese, terrible cooks - the list goes on.
Maddie McCann, Shannon Matthews, this Scarlett girl.
Let's be honest here: It IS the mother's fault that these things happen. End of.
Posted by: eddie | Saturday, 15 March 2008 at 02:54 PM
at least she will make enough money out of it now from all the media interest when she gets back to look after the rest of her kids now properly unless it all goes on another holiday.
Posted by: len | Saturday, 15 March 2008 at 04:37 PM
if we are judging fionas parenting we have to also look at the parenting of the guys that raped her, which is definitely questionable, what about a system that encourages un wed mothers to have any amount of kids just for the dole, is there no other way like giving them jobs to make these women work for their dole, so that they earn honest livings and have less time to indulge in long holidays of six months, and is not education for these kids compulsory, people realize the value of life and money, when they have to earn , for them selves.
fiona made a lot of mistakes.and perhaps her parenting is questionable, but what about the bad system that allows bars and shacks to run all night,on beaches with little or nor security ,no sufficient lighting and no warning boards , the system that covers up crime,a system that encourages drugs and sex on its beaches, scarlette was an unprotected kid,and fiona a neglient mother , but is not the daughter of a caring and careful mother exposed to the same crime of rape and drugs, a tablet slipped into a juice is enough , so how come the government is not taking this crime as it should,book the culprits,we should actually be thankful to fiona even though her private life was made public and her character was torn to pieces at least she had the courage to insist, on the case being exposed so that some other unfortunate teen may not face the same end, and worst of all , it is just in the news that scarlets organs are missing,if this is true, then every one envolved in this investigation needs to be investigated to.
as for all you moms out there, scarlet's case should be an eye opener. to fiona i hope time heals her wounds, and scarlette may her soul rest in peace
Posted by: clueless | Sunday, 13 April 2008 at 09:20 PM
I had to stop reading the comments to this sympathetic article, written by Andrew Buncombe.
It seems to me that an alarming number of people spend most of their effort and intellects on defending their own, personal opinions - often justifying themselves before challenging the expressions and thoughts of others - instead of truthfully considering what a mortality means. If anyone has lost someone close to them, they will know about the pain and the grief it causes and that those feelings have nothing to do with the circumstances of the family within which the deceased belonged (In this case, poor Scarlett).
I urge people to consider what sympathy means to you. What does empathy mean to you? Consider it independently, privately. Don't read what other people say, work it out for your self. I sense a lot of pain in the words of some of the people that have commented here. I agree about the irresponsibility of Fiona, as a mother, but now it is time for you all to realize your responsibilities as people. It is not right to want people to suffer, it's as simple as that. I could go on all day about why this is so, but I am constantly reading the media and your views and always try to refrain being dragged into these kind of arguments which are always centered around incoherent, unthoughtful perceptions. Consider yourselves and how you would feel if you were a victim of a crime, despite the circumstance.
Posted by: Matthew | Thursday, 17 April 2008 at 12:15 PM
Quote of the day ' 'Democracy is a form of government that allows everyone to be an oppressor'....however - within freedom of speech Matthew there has to be the understanding that in allowing people to air what they really think and feel, we understand what is really going on and that is healthy and we have to take every perspective into account. To be 'good' and to take 'the fair response' or to be sympathetic to something that needs to be looked at very deeply, may be the coward's way of dealing with things that really make that person uncomfortable and disturbed. Once a blog is opened by an author on such a very disturbing incident then one has to take the judgements and the sympathy as one whole picture. Your angle is totally one sided and that is not the whole truth in any situation.
Posted by: loppo | Tuesday, 22 April 2008 at 09:25 AM
Some one here said something abt the 'atrocious way western women are treated in India'. I want to say a few things about this being an Indian and having lived in London for some time.
Not all tourists who come to India are keen to learn to even borderline respectful of the Indian culture. If they paid a sligtest attention they would have known that in India to step out being dressed the way they do (usually with utter disregard to whats the acceptable norm) they would attract attention. I am not saying they should wear burqas but Indian women when out in public 'usually' dress very conservatively by western standards. So yes if you are out wearing a spagetti strap with no bra and cotton shorts they show your panty line you will be subject to 'atrocious behaviour'. You can avoid it by simply wearing something long sleeved and perhaps dare I say a fitted bra. Even I would attract attention should I walk down a street in London with my body painted red and blue. To an average Indian seeing a woman dressed like most western tourists do is a shock and they openly stare (I admit I am not proud of this). But try and appreciate the local mileu when you are there. India is more than dirt cheap shopping and a peadophilia heaven.
Posted by: Sohini | Thursday, 24 April 2008 at 12:23 PM
India still shows a ruthless and racist approach to the murder of a child from a foreign country: the mother was just recently charged by Indian police for "neglect". Amazing that even after a young girl has been killed, Indians will not treat it as a real crime but try to pin it down to the tourist. Just recently a Goa MP's own son has been accused of rape. I am sure this will not be taken to task either.
Posted by: Bill | Saturday, 18 October 2008 at 07:06 PM