You would have to be dead to read Jay Rayner’s new book The Man Who Ate the World and not feel a twinge of envy. The book is subtitled "In search of the perfect dinner", and the Observer restaurant critic travelled to Las Vegas, Moscow, Dubai, Tokyo, New York, London and Paris (though strangely, not Spain) in his Herculean efforts to gain the necessary material.
It’s a good read; smart, funny and well-paced. Clare Rayner’s boy
grew up on chopped liver and matzo and salt beef on rye, and describes
himself as "Jewish by food". He is at his best when describing the
pastrami at Katz’s Deli in New York, the garlic snails of his first
solo restaurant experience, and the table talk, with smart-arse
intelligent chefs or with his wife Pat, who sounds like an eminently
sensible woman.
The rest of it – the high-blown meals, the multi-courses, the minutiae of table service, the obscene prices of dining in the Michelin-approved style – while perfectly current, already feels a little dated, which could possibly be his truest comment on the state of dining in the year 2008. The great restaurants of the world aren’t, after all, the most glamorous, expensive, or three-starred. As Mario Batali is quoted as saying, "three Michelin stars has become nothing more than a guarantee that the ultra-rich could eat the same food anywhere in the world". Where in the real world, then, will you find the perfect dinner? I can feel a sequel coming on.
The Man Who Ate The World (£16.99) by Jay Rayner, published by headline review


The perfect dinner is an emotional experience. It is not just the food or venue per se but the recollection of the moment, one's dining companions and consequently the weightless lift it gives to your tired soul.
Posted by: stickyfingers | Thursday, 24 April 2008 at 06:15 AM
ugqdkjzr wnhe kqghw cenaxzu ygjchsmvr blms wztp
Posted by: jwep ywmvrngq | Thursday, 19 March 2009 at 01:00 PM