The festival has only just kicked off, and already there's a controversy. A lot of critics are in high dudgeon about opening night film Blindness, by Brazilian film-maker Fernando Meirelles.
It's adapted from the novel by Nobel-winning writer Jose Saramago, about a mysterious epidemic of blindness and its terrible consequences: the newly blind are sequestered in an austere, prison-like asylum, and largely left to fend for themselves. Anarchy breaks out, food supplies are sparse, and the hygiene conditions are nightmarish.
It is, in short, the most confrontational, and downright grim opening night film that Cannes has offered in some time - well, The Da Vinci Code was downright grim, but differently so. Meirelles' film has generally had a critical drubbing, although it has its enthusiasts - and personally, I think there's much to be admired about it, not least Julianne Moore's strong performance.
The main problem is that Saramago's book is so commandingly resonant that it simply didn't need to be adapted in the first place. Bringing such a degree of perfectionist realism to the theme is a bit like adapting Kafka's Metamorphosis and splashing out on a special-effects beetle.
Given the film's grimness, it felt very incongruous to attend last night's Blindness party. Quips predictably abounded - "I can't see anyone I know" - and a colleague wisecracked to the effect that the bash was remarkably true to the film, in that there wasn't enough food and no-one could find the toilets.
But actually it was a rather dignified
beachfront event, and hardkly undercatered. The macaroons were to die
for - but what the film's characters wouldn't have done for a macaroon
doesn't bear thinking about.
The party cleverly evoked the theme - you
entered through a tunnel of dazzling white light, which was an
interesting inversion, evoking the disoriented state in which you
usually leave Cannes parties. They could have gone all the way, though
- for example, by having door staff feel your face instead of checking
your invite.
(Photo: Reuters)


Comments