Minority Report: Has Ian Blair shot himself in the foot?
So the Metropolitan Police Commissioner has finally succeeded in forcing out his increasingly troublesome nemesis and No 3 Tarique Ghaffur (the pair are pictured together in 2005).
In a shock announcement yesterday Sir Ian Blair said that the Ugandan-born Assistant Police Commissioner, who is in the middle of taking the Met and Blair to a tribunal over alleged race discrimination, is to take an "authorised leave of absence".
Is this a shrewd move by Blair or has he just given more ammunition to his rival?
Blair was keen to emphasise yesterday that the reason for the gardening leave was not linked to the discrimination claim but rather it was "the way [Ghaffur] has chosen to conduct himself. For example by the manner in which statements were made in his press conference, in conducting a media campaign, both personally and through the advisors and organisations supporting him."
But there's no denying that Ghaffur's absence leaves Blair's pro-diversity policy in tatters and risks damaging a police force that has often had difficulty escaping a less than exemplary past when it comes to accusations of racism.
With the No 3 slot open there is now no ethnic minority officer above the rank of Commander in the Met and I doubt this will do much to silence the rather vocal Ghaffur. If anything it might embolden him.
It also reveals how much the Met dislikes all but a chosen few senior officers from talking to the press of their own volition.
Punishing Ghaffur for talking to the media about his concerns over race discrimination, however flamboyantly and excitedly he might have done so, makes the force look like it is desperately keen to avoid the public knowing about the damaging divisions at a senior level in one of the most important police forces in the country.
(Photo: Getty Images)


Oh dear.
The Independent, it seems, wants to assist the Commissioner in denying his complicity in the shooting of Jean de Menezes.
Which is presumably why my message on the subject was deleted from here.
Posted by: Neil McGowan | Thursday, 11 September 2008 at 12:52 PM
Er....Neil...it's called LIBEL. The paper would also be liable if someone decided to take legal action.
Posted by: Golam Murtaza | Friday, 10 October 2008 at 06:31 AM
Ever noticed how libel only applies to the rich?
Posted by: Begbie | Friday, 10 October 2008 at 12:29 PM
This piece helped me in writing a review of the Tarique Ghaffur saga - thank you very much! I tried to do a pingback but I'm not sure if it worked, so I thought I'd say hello the old fashioned way!
btw, the piece is online at http://www.fourgroups.com/blog/archives/13/tarique-ghaffur-ian-blair-and-the-metropolitain-police-service/
Posted by: Bruce Lewin | Monday, 13 October 2008 at 08:09 PM
Dies ist ein großer Ort. Ich möchte hier noch einmal.
Posted by: fahrrad | Friday, 06 March 2009 at 11:26 PM