A few weeks ago, I mentioned the YouTube Comment Snob, a handy bit of software that shields you from the worst excesses of stupidity that are left in the comments section of YouTube web pages. Webcomic xkcd came up with another idea to fight the menace at its source; ensure that anyone leaving a comment on YouTube would have their message read back to them aloud before they were allowed to post it. And look, YouTube have only been and gone and implemented it.
Well, almost. It's optional. But it's there. Leave a comment on any YouTube video, and you'll see an audio preview button, which will give you a rough idea of what you'd sound like if you were delivering the message face to face. It's another example of the "think first, post later" idea that Google came up with earlier this week with GMail Goggles, where drunken internet users are required to solve tricky maths problems before their incoherent ramblings can be sent. But, as someone pointed out over at Slashdot, the kind of people who really need to use YouTube's audio preview feature are actually the kind of people who either won't use it, or simply wouldn't be able to work out what it was for.
So we can still look forward to comments such as the one under this video from "subkilla27", who categorically states that
its proppa moggy man, donut earings & all that its potent flapjak beatz lyk a double glazin salesman off his tits on jam roly-poly
If you can't imagine what that might sound like if YouTube read it back to you, well, here you go. Whether the horror of this audio clip would be sufficient to prevent subkilla27 from sharing his thoughts with the world is, sadly, debatable.
CONFUSED ABOUT TECHNOLOGY? SUBMIT YOUR QUERIES TO CYBERCLINIC USING THE COMMENT FORM BELOW, OR EMAIL QUESTIONS HERE.

The mp3 is hilarious. Stephen Hawking needs to get back to thinking about black holes, though.
Posted by: Dan | Monday, 13 October 2008 at 12:49 AM
That is absolutely hilarious. I'm glad the audio preview was implemented in YouTube. It is a shame that the people who need it most probably wont use it though.
Posted by: James | Monday, 13 October 2008 at 05:32 AM
I've noticed that the mistakes in spelling and grammar in blog entries and comments are surprisingly often consistent with the text having been entered through a speech-to-text system and never proofread. It's quite possible that subkilla27 already knows that he sounds like a pratt....
Posted by: Ian Kemmish | Monday, 13 October 2008 at 08:33 AM