You are here : Home » IndyBlogs Home

 Subscribe to RSS

« A Nice Green Leaf: Please redirect! | Main | Keen on New Media: (de)Regulating capitalism and democracy »

Friday, 14 November 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341d0e8d53ef010535ee5ce8970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Cyberclinic: Spam success rate? 0.000008%:

Comments

Marysia

They didn't send any spam themselves, they hijacked an existing botnet sending spam and replaced the urls in the spam with their own perfectly safe but very trackable ones, thus allowing them to both track responses and orders and prevent stupid people from sending real orders to actual spammers.

Ian Kemmish

That's the proportion of people who willingly purchase fake pharmaceuticals.

Other studies report that on average 5% of recipients of spam at least "click through" (even just out of curiosity!) - which is enough to present them with a spoofed financial site or infect them with a drive-by virus. And it seems reasonable to suppose that the success rate for the more expensive technique of spear-phishing is even higher. Then there are the pump-and-dump scammers, whose spam doesn't even need an explicit click-through response, yet who I've seen turn over millions of dollars in a single day.

And that is the point isn't it? The sophisticated crooks are using the sophisticated, effective, and profitable techniques, and the morons at the bottom of the food chain are selling fake pharmaceuticals.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment