An attention-grabbing view on the upcoming Iranian elections came from an interview that Etemaad newspaper conducted with Mashallah Shamsolvaezin, a prominent reformist journalist. Shamsolvaezin believes that Ahmadinejad was the right choice for the Bush years and the right reaction against American neocons couldn't be anything but selecting an Iranian hard-line conservative; hawk to hawk.
He suggests that, for the same reason, the principled conservatives (Ossolgaras) will not nominate Ahmadinejad for a second term. If that happens, it will be novel in the history of the Islamic Republic.
After the revolution, except for two presidents, one assassinated and one sacked, all others have served for two terms. Ahmadinejad's congratulatory letter to Barack Obama has shocked some of his fellow Osoolgaras. However, if this is the strategic decision of the system, Ahmadinejad may only be paving the way for his successor to re-build relations with the United States.
As Obama's counterpart on the Iranian side, a dovish approach may better suit the purpose. Mohammd Baqer Qalibaf, current mayor of Tehran, and Ali Larijani, current speaker of the parliament, are two alternatives who may be favoured by the Right camp, Shamsolvaezin adds. These men are both closer to the centre and more pragmatic compared to Mr. Ahmadinejad. But at the same time, both of them carry a reservoir of loyalty to the Supreme Leader and the principles of the revolution. They share another similarity; both of them were defeated by Ahmadinejad in the last elections.
I think that the reformists and conservatives will make a very similar strategic move. Both camps are very likely to form a unity front, in which only one candidate is introduced. For reformists, it will be a matter of life and death if they want to stand the slightest chance.
The conservatives are also losing sleep as many factions in the right-wing camp have started voicing worryingly different selection criteria for a presidential candidate.
Another thing that will be at stake for conservatives is the popular vote that Ahmadinejad has secured in rural areas and small towns during his numerous visits across the country and by allocating resources to banks for low-interest loans.
The Right is rightly worried whether their alternative candidate would be successful in securing those votes. Yet cosmopolitan Tehran is a major battleground with over five million votes to bag. It's been a safe haven for reformists should voters show up on the day. Many people claim they're disillusioned and do not bother participating in the polls.
Whereas Ahmadinejad will not be able to count on many Tehrani votes, Qalibaf will be Right's best option in the capital, as many people are satisfied with his performance as mayor. I've even heard from people who would normally support reformists that if Qalibaf decides to run, he'll have their vote. But for the reformists the story is rather complicated. If they cannot convince Mohammad Khatami or someone equal to him in weight to run, they'll be doomed.
The trouble is that nearly no one has the same charisma, popularity or acceptance that Khatami can bring with him. That's perhaps why centrist Mr Rafsanjani, former president and an all-time player in Iranian politics, has allegedly asked Khatami to stop hesitating.
There has been speculation also that Mir Hossein Moossavi, who was Prime Minster for eight years during war, has been courted by his friends. A qualified architect and practicing painter, Moossavi has chaired the Iranian Academy of Arts for so many years that he may be criticised for being away from hardcore politics for too long. Iran has proved it never ceases to surprise.
Whether any of these calculations will bear any fruit I do not know. We may end up with another bombshell in the summer. Or who knows; maybe Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will be the captain for four Obamaic years through recession, populism and conflict.

Nice blog sir,
I am from erepublik, also amir jafari recomend your nice blog to me.
Posted by: Rasoul Baghban (Mcbride) | Tuesday, 18 November 2008 at 09:34 PM
hello.nice blog friend.
Posted by: mehdi | Thursday, 20 November 2008 at 03:30 PM
Obama is no dove, get these old ideas out of your minds! President Obama is a smart, conscientious, rational man who will remind the entire world of their better angels, get the support of the entire international community once again as in the time of FDR, and will promote justice, fairness, multilateral cooperations, and sustainable peace and security in the world! so stop thinking about the world in these Mickey Mouse terms of Dove and Hawk, the old world of political games are over, and if you want what's best for Iran, you should tell your leaders to understand the Obama world and come up with an equally as rational and level headed man for Iran's presidency, so that you won't be left in the dust!
I really don't care if your next president is a reformist or a conservative, as long as it is not this crazy man you have right now who scares the heck out of everybody in the world!!!! your new parliament speaker seems like a good rational man, why isn't he running for presidency?
Posted by: anna | Wednesday, 26 November 2008 at 02:05 PM
Dear Anna,
Can you tell me what are the scary things about President Ahmadinejad? I know he's been provocative, but the Western media has also done a lot to blow up his image as a scary figure; so I would like our discussion to be based on his original statements please.
Dear Ali,
I think if we have a chance for direct talks with the American administration, it has to be started by the hardliners in Iran. I think Ahmadinejad is a good candidate now because he will not be a target for domestic or regional criticism because of his anti-imperialist rhetoric. Only then can a reformist president like Khatami continue the avenue and build something based on his 'dialogue of civilisations'. Since I don't want Ahmadinejad in power for another 4 years, in my ideal scenario he would do this job and hand it over to Khatami in the upcoming elections!
Posted by: Pooya | Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 11:28 AM
Amazing...the Yanks and Israelis....massacre and kill in the hundreds of thousands in Iraq and Lebanon and Gaza, and it is Ahmadinejad who is scary...????? Since the Iranian system doesn't afford him any real HARD power, his bluster and public relation gaffes have been turned against the country as some demonic intent. And all the time, despite the phony cry of wolf from the usual suspects (USA,UK and Israel), those same countries have turned the region into killing fields.And whoever is elected to represent the next Iranian Government , must always remember that the US and Israel are more Cheney and Netanyahu than Khatami.
Posted by: alex | Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 02:31 AM
Hello
Just what I was looking for..Thanks for all.
Posted by: Generic Viagra | Thursday, 03 December 2009 at 03:18 PM