You are here : Home » Open House Home

 Subscribe to RSS

Recent Comments

« That smashed up violin | Main | Pick of Overseas Comment »

Thursday, 14 February 2008

Ken versus Boris: The Opening Verdict

By Steve Richards

I have just returned from the first hustings in London’s mayoral contest, the nearest we will all get to the fun people are having in the US with their presidential election. Here are some quick thoughts:

1. The meeting was packed even though it took place in the middle of a grey Thursday morning. Who said people are not interested in politics? London is lucky to have a Mayor and the elections that come with the high profile post. It is extraordinary to recall that until Labour introduced the system London had no elected body, no accountable forum, no space for voters to debate issues in one of the most important cities in the world. Geoffrey Howe was right when he described the abolition of the old GLC as the biggest mistake made by the Tory government in the 1980s. Other cities in Britain should be pleading for a similar system.

2. The hustings was organised by the Green Alliance so obviously the issues under consideration related to the environment. Other meetings will no doubt focus on other policies areas. Even so it is amazing how quickly the environment has become a pivotal issue with all four candidates competing to prove their environmental credentials.

3. What a joy to attend a meeting where the focus was on policy and not on the attempts by the Evening Standard to destroy Ken Livingstone.

4. In that context Livingstone was the best performer, authoritative and self-assured. Boris Johnson still cannot utter a sentence without raising a laugh, even though he is trying to be serious. For the Greens, Sian Berry, is a star but has not got a hope of winning. Nor has the Lib Dems’ Brian Paddick who appeared out of his depth.

5. Livingstone versus Johnson is not exactly Obama versus Hilary/John McCain, but it will be good political theatre and the outcome matters.

Comments

"What a joy to attend a meeting where the focus was on policy and not on the attempts by the Evening Standard to destroy Ken Livingstone."
So it's all the media's fault is it? Nothing the Standard has published has proved to be true or in any way bothered you I assume. Or is it that you don't approve of newspapers targetting someone/something they think is a wrong-un. That's not up the Indy's street any more, I admit. Too much like hard (and costly) investigative work. Opinion, after all, is so much cheaper.
And how come you blether on about what a joy it is to go to a meeting which is about policy, rather than personalities, and then say NOTHING about the policies in question. Well, I suppose you give yourself away at the end. It's not really about what's best for voters or what voters want. It's about generating "good political theatre".
Pathetic journalism.

Hear, hear to Anne Murphy's comment. What on earth is Steve Richard's saying? That our only London paper should ignore the stench of scandal to do with misappropriation of millions of pounds of Londoners' money by the people who are closer to Livingstone than anyone else in politics? That this shouldn't factor into our plans on how to vote?

You're too right that the outcome matters. For a greener, safer London we need rid of Livingstone and to replace him with Boris Johnson.

Apologies for the extraneous apostrophe on my previous comment.

Come On Boris, you can do it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PpMdTmVMpo&feature=related

I saw on Boris's Blog a suggestion by him that REDUCING our Population would help with Emmisions targets re Pollution Global Warming, Which is true of course.

Thinking further, it would also ease Congestion on our roads, reduce crime (and prison overcrowding) it would solve the Housing crisis AND welfare and NHS Overstretch.

Not only that but we would be able to habd over to our children a Green and Pleasant land.

This should be a Main Boris / Conservative Policy.

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk

Post a comment