Bring me sunshine
By John Rentoul
What has happened to Sunny Dave, who told his first Conservative conference, "Let sunshine win the day"? His article in The Times this week, responding to a stinging leading article by Daniel Finkelstein, new chief leader writer and normally ardent Cameroon, was dismal.
Not just because its first sentence was ungrammatical (Times sub-editors should surely have corrected it). But because the message was both negative and empty.
After 11 years of Labour Government, Cameron says, "precious little has been achieved". Negative. "Our society is broken." Negative. "Despite all the amazing opportunities of modern Britain, life can be pretty grim." Negative.
The task of a Conservative government, he says, would be "lifting up our society". And he asks himself, "How exactly are we going to do it?" By setting out "three agendas - for opportunity, responsibility and security." Empty. "They are all intimately connected." Cliche. "We will give more power to charities and social enterprises." Empty. (As well as being existing Government policy.) So that leaves him with: "We will give parents the power to set up new schools." Tick.
The negativity is a matter for political judgement. I think it is a mistake. However crass "Let sunshine win the day" might have been, it was the right message. But that is a matter of opinion. The emptiness is worse than a mistake; by failing to answer the very charges made against him in the leading article, that he is insubstantial and unclear, Cameron confirms them.

Who do those quotes remind me of? Tony Blair 1997 maybe?
John Rentoul wrote "[David Cameron said]"We will give more power to charities and social enterprises." Empty. (As well as being existing Government policy.)
What he actually means is "We're going to be cutting back public services and asking charities to do the job with a tenth of the funding, so we can give more handouts of taxpayers' money to big companies so they'll give us campaign donations, seats on their boards when we retire as MPs and endorsements as 'a party that can be trusted on the economy'."
Not that different to Gordon Brown/Tony Blair as long as PFIs , export credits for BAE and subsidies for privatised rail firms go on though.
Posted by: Duncan McFarlane | Saturday, 05 July 2008 at 06:07 PM
How can you expect the party of slavery to look on the upside. The tories are just the party of big business.
It is a well know fact that the tories did not get rid of slavery the whig party did.
Posted by: dirty european socialist | Saturday, 05 July 2008 at 11:27 PM
Do all senior politicians use the same speech and article writer? It all sounds the same, whoever says it. Doesn't matter how insubstantial Cameron sounds - all we ask him to do is get this lot out. When things have reached rock bottom, better the devil you don't know than the one you do. All Cameron needs to do is 'float like a butterfly and sting like a bee.' And to be doubly sure have a nice chat with Clegg.
Posted by: john problem | Sunday, 06 July 2008 at 08:53 AM