Hawaii goes Macadamia (nuts) for Obama
By David Usborne in Honolulu, Hawaii
Note to the Clinton team: maybe you should consider challenging the vote tally in Hawaii last night. Correct procedures were not always followed. Hell, it was utter pandemonium at most caucus sites on Tuesday night. Party registration forms ran out. Ballot papers ran out. Good Lord, at some sites, officials were tearing pages out of notebooks bought at corner stores to write out makeshift ballot papers in ballpoint pen. Who could tell if people were voting once or 10 times?
On the other hand, maybe you just swallow it. Getting petty now would hardly disguise the fact that your candidate, even with the backing of the main party institutions and the islands' unions, was swept away here by a Pacific tsunami. Surfer boy Obama rode the half-pipe. Hillary was crushed by it.
For fans of democracy what happened here was pretty thrilling. Consider: in past Hawaii caucuses the total number of votes cast up and down the archipeligo has sometimes been as low as 5,000. Realising, things might be different this time - Obama being a native son and all - party officials printed off 17,000 ballot papers. And how many people actually showed up, standing in line sometimes for more than an hour, unable to park their cars and confused by the chaos? No fewer than 37,182. No wonder it became a bunfight and final results weren't out until almost midnight.
So leave it alone. Hawaii may have run an utterly botched caucus election on Tuesday that would make the hanging chads saga of Florida seem almost textbook by comparison. But there was a reason things went haywire. Unfettered Obamamania.

Hy,
I LIKE THIS SITE
-David Smith
HawaiiAlcoholAddictionTreatment
Posted by: david smith | 26 August 2008 at 10:48 PM
Hi,
I like your posting,
its very nice,
Bye.
http://www.drugaddiction.net/hawaii
Posted by: John Disoja | 22 August 2008 at 10:36 PM
You campaign trailers' views are biased and given to cheap-shot cleverness at the expense of candidates. What gives with the so-called "independent" perspective? USA-bashing is old hat, clearly the style of a soused group of reporters.
Posted by: Shela Bright | 24 February 2008 at 08:33 AM