As straight talking Jack Cafferty said "when you die,you lie down" and " you throw the Hail Mary pass during the game and not when the game is over". So madam, please lie down and forget about May 31st.You and Mr.Ickes ( did he really bite an opponent's leg?) voted for the rule against Florida and Michigan .. remember?

crat3:

In 1992, Bill Clinton almost exclusively got the black vote; in 1996, Bill Clinton almost exclusively got the black vote. In 2008, Barack Obama is almost exclusively getting the black vote. Please explain the racism in those three voting years.

Obviously hasn't occurred to you that the black vote is simply going to the candiate they like. Or is it that you feel there was some law enacted whereby ONLY the Clintons should receive the black vote?

Clinton's nomination was hers to lose. The fact she went from heir presumptive to trailing in both delegates and the popular vote is testament to the abysmal campaign she ran, organised by a bunch of insiders who took her for millions of dollars in 'consulting fees' and failed to deliver the goods.

The facts that she showed such poor judgement to hire these imbeciles in the first place, then to keep them on the payroll after Ohio; that her campaign is bleeding red ink all over the place; that from comments she's made she'd rather see John "Bush Lite" McCain in the White House than anyone but her; that after the Gore-Bush fiasco on 2000 in which Gore won the popular vote but a stacked Supreme Court egged on by Republicans throwing tantrums that would shame a two-year-old, she would attempt to use essentially the same tactics to secure the Democratic nomination, all indicate she should not be trusted with the nomination. And this isn't to mention the absurd gas tax proposal and the ridiculously intemperate, overwrought (and patently false) "We can obliterate Iran" comments she made a couple of weeks ago.

This isn't to say Obama is the perfect candidate for the Democrats, nor even the Presidency; but of the assortment on offer (Clinton, McCain, Obama), he is certainly the least imperfect and the most aware of what needs to be done and what sacrifices need to be made to get the US back on track.

And crat3's remarks are typical of the snide insinuations that has been a hallmark of the Clinton campaign and further evidence why she should not be nominated. If Obama has been propelled merely by the electorate voting on these criteria, he should be scrapping with Gravel and Kucinich at the back of the pack, not leading Clinton a merry dance right down to the wire.

Clinton has the right to chase Obama to the bitter end, but don't start gaming the system when it comes to losing the popular vote but still expecting to be handed the nomination by horse-trading with insiders and superdelegates. That would make a mockery of the entire 'democratic' process.

Yeah, what experience do you need to be President? There are senior Senators and Congressmen who may not want to be President but are "qualified". I think a true leader is one who can recognize those around him who are qualified to do the best job and to utilize them properly. Beyond skin color, "crat3, this person should be able to lead by example.

Hilary Clinton is stealing a page from the Bill Clinton School of Politics to try to steal the nomination. She and Ickes voted to strip the delegates of FL and MI and now want them counted??? That is absurd especially since they broke the rules? Great, so Hillary will do anything to save her a** and her botched up dream of being president. She should have changed her strategy long before now. To little, too late. Obama doesnt have 2,024 but neither does she....She has plenty of experience doing underhanded tricks since she is Mrs. Bill Clinton....

Obama has not won enough delegates to be the nominee. Nothing Clinton is doing is out of the ordinary. People want Obama to be the nominee, so they are trying to stop the process. Clinton is making sure the Democrats put forth the best candidate in the general election. More power to her.

First of all if a recount in the states of Michigan and Florida is to take place it will tarnish the democratic party and not only split into various factions but explode into a free for all gang war. Seriously though, Clinton does not have that kind if pull to have that over-turned. Second if it was trully based the color of skin the votes would not of been so close in Indiana and that's just merely one example out of many. Last but not least there is experience and then there is an over abudance of experience and that is something that Hillary has is just too much. She has been in this game for so long that her politics reflects what era she derives from. Obama is ushering in the new Era, black or not change will take place with Obama, history will repeat with Hillary

Uh, crat3? Shut. Up.

What does 'experience' mean when you apply for the presidency of the united states? Did Ronald Reagan have that so called experience? What is really needed is charisma,integrity, good judgment and a solid team of consultants.Hilary has ran a very poor campaign and has allowed Obama to grab the spot. Had she done a better Job, she would have nailed the nomination. Obama, regardless of the colour of his skin had a better plan.

Obama does not have the requisite number of delegates for the presidential nomination; he has no presumptive lock on the nomination. The Democratic nomination process calls for all states to vote and if the candicates come up short on the delegates, then the superdelegates must select the best experienced, qualified candidate for the presidency using their independent judgment and that is Sen. Hillary Clinton. This is a selection process based on the criteria of qualifications - there is no "backroom deal" about that.

Obama is simply inexperienced and unqualified for the presidency - he should get no free pass because of his skin color and black racism that has given him several victories over Sen. Clinton.