You are here : Home » On the Campaign Trail Home

 Subscribe to RSS

« McCain: 'I strenuously disagree with my spokesman' | Main | No You Can't! »

24 June 2008

Does a Bush 'October surprise' await Iran?

By Leonard Doyle

Bill Kristol, editor of the Murdoch owned neocon house journal the Weekly Standard says Bush is more likely to attack Iran if he believes Barack Obama is going to be elected.

Speaking on Sunday to Fox News' Chris Wallace he said, "If the president thought John McCain was going to be the next president, he would think it more appropriate to let the next president make that decision than do it on his way out," before suggesting Bush might move more quickly if he thought Obama was going to win. Wallace then asked if Kristol was suggesting that Bush might "launch a military strike" before or after the election. Watch it:

Kristol has bloviated about Bush attacking Iran before leaving office in the past. In April, he opined that  it wasn't "out of the question" that Bush would consider such a strike because "people are overdoing how much of a lame duck the president is."

The idea that an Obama victory could encourage Bush  to act has also done the rounds. The right-wing  scholar Daniel Pipes has been telling the National Review Online that "President Bush will do something" if Obama wins.

Comments

Mark E,

What is it with you hypersensitive conservatives who can defend themselves with ad hominem and transparent misrepresentations, distortions, and outright falsehoods? It's as if facts and reason are too inconvenient and obstructionist for you to employ.

You say:

"Someone being to the right of you, a far lefty, doesn't make them the far right, regarding Dan Pipes. What's with you guys on the left and throwing those terms around but trying to pretend you aren't biased?"

It is in fact YOU that has interjected the terms 'far right' into this discourse, as Mr Doyle had written 'right wing scholar'. It was up to you to infer it to mean 'far right'. But then, why would you infer such a thing unless there might actually be some truth to it. Did you even bother to follow the link he provides to reference this label? Anyone that continues to peddle the ridiculous 'Obama is a Muslim' or 'Obama was raised a Muslim' meme can be fairly safely labeled as 'far right' with an agenda or outright delusional as its been debunked time and again. In fact the whole snippet from the National Review, for anyone that has done even a modicum of objective research on the subject, exemplifies the deception of propaganda journalism at its most seditious.

National Review quote:

"Several elementary-school teachers in Indonesia have told reporters that he was enrolled as a Muslim — and thus studied Koran instead of the Catechism — at the Catholic school he attended. One of his various half sisters says it too, and several passages in his autobiography seem to indicated the same thing."


To anyone that has read his AB, it's sickening how much this paragraph strives to distort the truth. Several passages certainly indicate which schools he attended in Indonesia as he writes himself that he spent 2 years at a Muslim school, and 2 years at a Catholic school. There's no instruction of Islam at a Catholic school, and it's absurd to insinuate otherwise. That's why there are separate schools that are deemed 'Muslim' and 'Catholic' and what Pipes is proposing is absurd.

Obama also mentions how he would get in trouble at the Muslim school by making faces during prayer sessions, and the harsh complaints from his instructors in religious studies was something his mother was never too concerned with, only reprimanding him to 'be respectful' of other people's beliefs. Considering his father was a confirmed atheist who believed religion to be a bunch of 'mumbo jumbo' and his mother was a humanist, it leaves little wonder why he might have acted skeptically to religious instruction during his upraising.

It's disconcerting to see anyone that has obviously researched this and read his AB, and knowing his parent's non-religious outlook, work so diligently to distort the facts in order to paint Obama as being a practicing patron of any religion during his upbringing, much less the 4 years he spent in Indonesia. It's intentional character assassination rooted in deceit and the politics of fear, which any objective journalist or researcher would recognize instantly. In fact only labeling him a 'right wing scholar', Mr Doyle was being far, far, FAR too kind. 'Right wing propagandist' would be accurate. Why do academic scholars, that the right brands 'left wing' strive for truth and accuracy while those kindly labeled 'right wing scholars' consistently practice deception and revisionism?

Brilliant!

Leonard,
Someone being to the right of you, a far lefty, doesn't make them the far right, regarding Dan Pipes. What's with you guys on the left and throwing those terms around but trying to pretend you aren't biased?

Does a Bush 'October surprise' await Iran?
No. Why ?
Look at the newspaper in UK. They are distorted. The Time shows some photographs, click by click as if we were really looking at the dishonesty, that too now, of the photography tricks. What a waste of time?
Iran has fired the missiles in July and will fire more just to show Bush that he was wrong in Iraq but he can bet his ass that he will be right about no shut down in the Iran missile. Russia and others have already protested to Rice signing the missile shields in Czech and Poland. Iran is an ideal place to prove Bush wrong this time. They have these and this is not another WMD. It is real Tom and Jerry or Andy Cap story come true.
He had better take his seat and leave, as no one will miss him.
He has left all of us so broke that the oil at 148 was never in the budgets of many states. Now we have this. May be words do not hurt like the sticks and stones but they create missiles ready just in case.
Britain to continue to fight for UN envoy despite veto
This would never happened if we would not have taken the words of Mr. Bush with Mr. Tony Blaire on the false dossiers of the Iraq war and the alleged WMD, that were never there. Anyone would now say, “Okay we made mistake. Let us forget and stride forward”. However, this is the nation that is drowning. This sort of ironically cooked up wars never was in the history of America.
I have purposely chosen three topics to show that Mr. Brown is following the steps of his predecessor Mr. Tony Blaire who is nowhere to be seen. Russia and China the mighty powers are reaping profits from the African continent and UN too does not want any civil disturbances that UN knows will start the time the external pressure is put on Mughabe. The African countries do not want to interfere. They too are poor with the oil today Saturday, 12 July 2008, 148usdpb. Why does Mr. Brown think he will benefit anything in futile he tries to save few British farms? Uganda was, now is a gone case exactly as Zimbabwe. Why. Why, why, we do not learn from the history we make?
Today's papers
The Falling Giants
By Daniel Politi
Posted Friday, July 11, 2008, at 6:21 AM ET
U.S. Weighs Rescue of Mortgage Giants.
Then America went to boost the dollar to such an extent that all bowed and said. “Sir, you are all mighty. You lead; we follow you all the way, shoulder to shoulder, from the fatigued soldiers of Afghanistan to Iraq and call UN too to help us”.
This has all of us in the gutter looking for pennies or cents.
To add to the above, I see the TV that is very clear that is ripple has gone as far as the Norway shores and the estate agents there are broke now.
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla DBA
P.O.Box 6044
Dar-Es-Salaam
Tanzania
East Africa


Why are you giving Kristol any credibility at all?

Bush to attack Iran?

If Bush bombs Iran without congressional approval (which he would never be able to get), then he the cries not only from the left but from the rest of the world would only strengthen to hold Bush accountable for war crimes and his flagrant contempt for international law.

It's clear that we cannot live in a unipolar world, as evidenced by the consequences of tyrants like Bush taking office. Our best hope is for the rise of the other superpowers BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) as well as vigilance of the EU to indict the criminals in the administration to hold them accountable for the war criminals that they are.

It all starts with the necessity of an Obama presidency, as international pressure to hold Bush accountable would be far more likely to justify internal investigations by a new Attorney General that the foreign establishment would defer to than a defiant McCain administration that would no doubt push back with threats against any EU indictments against US officials.

Between now and November as much publicity as possible must be given to the fact that there very likely WILL be an October surprise, either by Bush in attempt to sway the electorate by bombing Iran, or a new video message from Bin Laden in a 2004 redux in order to once again deceive the American people to vote for McCain by endorsing Obama as a 'Son of Islam' and one of his own.

I've already seen a few articles warning of this almost certainly likelihood, such as a recent piece in Time magazine questioning what would happen if terrorists Barack the vote, but much more publicity on this matter is an absolute necessity to educate people on the motives behind such October surprises.

I'm a cynic simply because of what is certain to come, not just with October surprises, but the mass disenfranchisement of blacks and other democratic voters, whose sleazy operations have already begun in earnest business as usual. The reticence of Democratic officials to confront these dirty tactics that cost them in 2004 and 2000 is mind boggling. Until there's a change of parties in executive leadership in the November elections I have negligible confidence in the ability for real reforms in the future.

As far as I'm concerned, the American republic is dead circa 2000, and the nefarious empire that has replaced it spells the beginning of the end of America and its democratic experiment.


We already know from bitter experience that Bush will stop at nothing to project his fantasised "tough guy" image on the world. He was always solely about "getting away with it" and dressing that up as "concern for us" - laughing all the way to the bank - even while he's bankrupting other people and making still others - Muslims - disappear violently "because it's their own fault anyway, I did tell them "do what I want or else" - so now I'm giving myself carte blanche again, as always". He literally doesn't care about the fallout, in every sense, as long as he gets his way by hook or by crook. Same old same old - this is what gamblers and addicts do.

US & Israel attack Iran Civilian Nuclear Facilities is suicide cause Iran have aready secretly developed 300 plus tactical nuclear warhead & secretly bought 400 plus tactical nuclear weapons & 100 plus ICBM with strategic nuclear warhead from Russia, China, India, Pakistan and North Korea. Iran have now capacity to totally destroy and burn whole Israel, all US military base in the middle east, Washington DC, New York City, London, Berlin, Rome, Paris, Vatican, Brussel and etc. Iran civilian nuclear facilities is only a bait. Iran ready to catch very very big fish.

Aftermath = Do the math afterwards!

For a reality check on Iran, see
http://www.bibijon.org/iranimage/

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment